[10:01pm] balunasj: serogers: I know that your would like to discuss the upcoming A2 release.

[10:01pm] balunasj: let me just list out a couple things as well - then we can strat with your point

[10:01pm] serogers: OK

[10:02pm] balunasj: 1) Integration with assembly for release artifact assembly - I asked Alex_Kolonitsky to join us for that

[10:02pm] balunasj: 2) Archetype for A2 - Pavol from QE is going to move to 4.0 svn this morning

[10:03pm] balunasj: 2.1) prabhat do you know why lukas and pavol are not on?

[10:03pm] balunasj: 3) Some comments on getting start guide.

[10:03pm] balunasj: </end>

[10:03pm] balunasj: so anything else you would like to discuss feel free to bring up

[10:04pm] serogers: OK, no problem

[10:05pm] serogers: Well I mainly wanted to see how things are going for alpha2 and whether the docs as they are will be suitable

[10:06pm] balunasj: serogers: So Alpha2 is tight, but on track for a code freeze friday ( time over weekend if needed)

[10:07pm] balunasj: serogers: Then build to QE mid next week.

[10:07pm] balunasj: serogers: 1 week of QE then release

[10:07pm] balunasj: as for docs - I have a few comments - some I'll share here, and some I'll just email.

[10:07pm] serogers: OK, cool

[10:08pm] balunasj: my main concern is not the draft state of the docs, but that some of the info is out of date because it is drawn from 3.3 docs.

[10:08pm] serogers: Yep; this is what I hope to catch with the tech reviews

[10:08pm] balunasj: One thing with the archetype and and getting started guide is that we need to get the user seeing something usefull in 30min

[10:09pm] balunasj: And I appoligize for not getting to the review for getting started guide until now.

[10:10pm] balunasj: So the main thing I would like to see is that once pavol gets the archetype inplace 0

[10:10pm] balunasj: is that you integrate that into the getting started guide.

[10:10pm] balunasj: There are also some changes with whats in the requirements for release.

[10:10pm] serogers: OK

[10:10pm] balunasj: just so I know is this the latest :

[10:11pm] balunasj: but it does not look like there are changes.

[10:12pm] serogers: Yep, they are the latest

[10:12pm] balunasj: ok good - those were the ones I was looking at.

[10:12pm] balunasj: You'll have my comments in your email for your tomorrow morning.

[10:13pm] serogers: Great, thanks

[10:13pm] balunasj: Just so you know what I'm thinking about

[10:13pm] balunasj: For requirments I'd like it clearly broken up into server, client, and dev requirements

[10:13pm] balunasj: although dev is more for recommendation

[10:14pm] serogers: OK

[10:14pm] balunasj: Then also updating the maven and tools sections based the latest JBoss tools, and maven setting from JBoss and project.

[10:15pm] balunasj: also to save my printer ink and eyes - we need to change the styling of the console output to not be black.

[10:15pm] balunasj: I'm not sure if there is a template for it or not

[10:15pm] serogers: I know, that is a left-over styling from the old styles

[10:15pm] serogers: I'll look into getting that changed

[10:16pm] balunasj: Also do you have JBTools installed?

[10:16pm] serogers: Yes

[10:16pm] balunasj: ok good

[10:16pm] balunasj: Basically I just want to make sure the getting started guide is accurate for new users starting with A2.

[10:16pm] balunasj: the other sections can be draft/skeleton be that one needs to be spot on.

[10:17pm] balunasj: ilya_shaikovsky: you already reviewed the GSG section right?

[10:19pm] balunasj: not sure if he is on

[10:19pm] balunasj: lets move on to assembly for now

[10:19pm] balunasj: Alex_Kolonitsky has been working on that.

[10:19pm] balunasj: Alex_Kolonitsky what is the current state of the assembly with the docs?  Have you gotten to it yet?

[10:20pm] ilya_shaikovsky: ilya_shaikovsky, not looked to the latest version

[10:21pm] balunasj: ilya_shaikovsky: oh ok - np - just wondering

[10:23pm] balunasj: Alex_Kolonitsky: ping

[10:23pm] Alex_Kolonitsky: no

[10:23pm] balunasj: Alex_Kolonitsky: ok - np I know you have been working on other bits

[10:24pm] balunasj: Alex_Kolonitsky: serogers : so alex is going to work towards getting the doc bundle integrated with assembly

[10:24pm] serogers: OK

[10:24pm] balunasj: serogers: Not sure if you have seen the forum posts on this.

[10:25pm] serogers: It is all built with Maven so that should be fine

[10:25pm] balunasj: serogers: yup - that is what I'm hoping.  I just wanted to see if there were issue you might see

[10:26pm] serogers: Not that I can think of

[10:27pm] balunasj: I'll have pavol write up a description of using the archetype, then it would be good to verify it

[10:27pm] balunasj: and update the GSG with it.

[10:27pm] serogers: OK, great

[10:28pm] balunasj: The only other thing I can think of is that we discussed moving the CDK doc to the CDK module because it will be packaged into a separate distribution.

[10:28pm] balunasj: serogers: I know you commented on that.

[10:28pm] serogers: Yep

[10:29pm] balunasj: I'm not sure it will make it into A2 or not because timing is tight

[10:29pm] serogers: Not much has been done on the CDK guide

[10:29pm] serogers: It's the lowest priority of the guides at the moment

[10:29pm] balunasj: btw - it appears that something is wrong in Brno - no one from there seems to be online.

[10:29pm] balunasj: serogers: agree

[10:30pm] balunasj: Thats all I had for now, is there anything else - from serogers or anyone?

[10:31pm] serogers: Nothing else from me

[10:31pm] ilya_shaikovsky: seems no for that moment.. Sean i'll do my best to send the review for GSG till tommorow.. sorry for the delay..

[10:32pm] balunasj: ok then - with so much going on pre release lets end early and we can keep moving.

[10:32pm] serogers: Great, thanks everyone