Log in to follow, share, and participate in this community.
Thread Starting release process for 4.5.2.Final
Starting release process for 4.5.2.FinalThe release process for 4.5.2.Final is about to begin. Further commits into develop branch will not be considered in release.
UIRepeat issuesFirst of all we seem to be tracking two kinds of issues: Components not keeping their state when the page is refreshed although caused by the same thing I'd expect this is working as intended, and a panel losing its ...
CDK richfaces client side codeDears, Can anybody provide an example for Richfaces client-side code using CDK 4.5.0, this article is not attaching client side events to my component. Thanks.
Guava dependency - to drop or not to drop?This does become a pain point for users as the guava library moves quite rapidly. and deprecates/removes quickly. That is fine for user code as I can easily refactor, but if I want to use a new guava version t...
Starting release process for 4.5.1.FinalThe release process for 4.5.1.Final is about to begin. Further commits into develop branch will not be considered in release.
Starting release process for 4.5.0.FinalThe release process for 4.5.0.Final is about to begin. Further commits into develop branch will not be considered in release. (Hopefully this won't take two hours to finish like last time)
Starting release process for 4.5.0.CR2The release process for 4.5.0.CR2 is about to begin. Further commits into develop branch will not be considered in release. Edit: Slow upload today, I've been deploying CR2 for about an hour now. I'll deploy arche...
Graphene and Drone dependenciesHi, while I was going through some test dependencies I found out that RF have the following dependencies: <version.arquillian.graphene>2.1.0.Alpha1</version.arquillian.graphene> <versio...
RichFaces on JRE 1.6Hi Team, One of the RichFaces requirements for WFK is to run on JRE 1.6. We should run our test suite against JRE 1.6 as soon as possible to make sure we have the desired compatibility. Ideally w...
Chart component for mobile devicesSomewhere along 4.5.0.Alpha2 release we decided not to support rich:chart for mobile devices. I found two related issues to this - RF-13709[1] and RF-13702[2]. Both mention something like 'for the time being we are r...
Starting release process for 4.5.0.CR1The release process for 4.5.0.CR1 is about to begin. Further commits into develop branch will not be considered in release.
Generating JsDocConcerning RF-8904 there doesn't seem to be a way to get rid of the full names through the plugin configuration. (And the plugin wasn't updated since 2008). Should we switch to some other tool? I've found this...
Starting release process for 4.5.0.Beta2The release process for 4.5.0.Beta2 is about to begin. Further commits into develop branch will not be considered in release.
Staged JSFTest 1.1.8, RichFaces CDK 4.5.0.Beta2Staging profile (for both): Index of /repositories/jboss_releases_staging_profile-3806 JSFTest Version and tag: 1.1.8 CDK Version and tag: 4.5.0.Beta2
Thread RichFaces cache classes - are they needed ?
RichFaces cache classes - are they needed ?With trying to resolve RF-13475, I started to wondering: Why there are those cache configuration classes in RichFaces core ? Afaik, there are no tests (except the unit tests), ensuring that this caching wo...
Chart component namingI think the current naming of the chart sub-components is a little vague, especially when viewing the VDL doc where the components are all over the list. The components are: rich:chart rich:legend rich:point rich...
Page Fragment API reviewHello rich faced devs! In reviewing a recent PR for RF-13301:" Favor use of Page Fragments in Framework Tests" I've gotten a good chance to see page fragments in action. I really like how they remove...
Re-scheduling 5.0.0.Alpha4 issuesHey guys, I realized we had a bunch of unresolved issues scheduled for RichFaces 5.0.0.Alpha4. I've reviewed them, many were obsolete and have been resolved as such, while some I've scheduled for 4.5-T...
TomEE upgrade in RichFaces repoHi, I'd like to upgrade TomEE 1.6 Arquillian profiles in RF repository with TomEE 1.7. I already have it on a feature branch [1]. Since it's not a primary target for us, IMHO it's safe to upgrade. What do you ...