This content has been marked as final.
Show 6 replies
-
1. Re: Why have you reversed my changes on replication?
clebert.suconic Mar 4, 2009 8:22 AM (in response to timfox)PageFailoverStressTest was failing. There was a multi-thread-test on failover.
And I also added a test on the integration testsuite to also fail when the order is not respected.
Maybe the order is not being guaranteed. -
2. Re: Why have you reversed my changes on replication?
clebert.suconic Mar 4, 2009 8:25 AM (in response to timfox)I see that you reverted it.
PagingFailoverTest will fail. -
3. Re: Why have you reversed my changes on replication?
timfox Mar 4, 2009 8:29 AM (in response to timfox)Order is definitely guaranteed. You'd need to find the real reason the test is failing.
Maybe the order is ok, but it hasn't been depaged yet.
If so we'll need to continue to force a depage, but it'll be guaranteed to be in the first page read. -
4. Re: Why have you reversed my changes on replication?
timfox Mar 4, 2009 8:35 AM (in response to timfox)Ok i partially re-instated the force depage with some changes. PagingFailovreTest now passes
-
5. Re: Why have you reversed my changes on replication?
clebert.suconic Mar 4, 2009 8:44 AM (in response to timfox)"timfox" wrote:
Order is definitely guaranteed.
Even among different producers? -
6. Re: Why have you reversed my changes on replication?
clebert.suconic Mar 4, 2009 8:56 AM (in response to timfox)"clebert.suconic@jboss.com" wrote:
"timfox" wrote:
Order is definitely guaranteed.
Even among different producers?
Please ignore this question :-)