Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture

[nthx]

The range around 1098/1099 can also be used by mapped shares. Really, mapped shares do occupy a port in this range.

[tom.elrod]

Ports can be changed in conf/jboss-service.xml (or can use the ServiceBindingManager, which is commented out within the same file).

[nthx]

Hmmm, something wrong happens to the forum or sth.. (bug?)

I did NOT post former post here on this forum.
I did started topic "Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture" on other forum.
I've been watching the topic.

I've just reveived notification, someone answered to notified topic but this isn't true. More: the topic is in wrong place.. :(

Check this one:

Subject: Topic Reply Notification - Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture
Charset: iso-8859-1

Hello ,

You are receiving this email because you are watching the topic, "Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture" at JBoss.com. This topic has received a reply since your last visit. You can use the following link to view the replies made, no more notifications will be sent until you visit the topic.

http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3859323#3859323

and this one..

http://www.jboss.com/?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3856945

Really strange, ???

Regards, Tomasz

[starksm64]

There were integrety problems with the integration with the forum database due to an incorrect table type that resulted in invalid user to post associations. These should be fixed as of this past weekend.