This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: rename ClassAdapter to AspectAdapter?
adrian.brock Apr 21, 2005 12:11 PM (in response to bill.burke)I refer the honourable gentlement I gave some moments ago:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=and&format=short&config=jboss-development_lists_sourceforge_net&restrict=&exclude=&words=humpty
i.e. Worry about what it does, rather than what it is called. -
2. Re: rename ClassAdapter to AspectAdapter?
starksm64 Apr 21, 2005 12:14 PM (in response to bill.burke)Call it ClassAdapter2 to adopt the wonderfully clear convention used with class loading implementations.
-
3. Re: rename ClassAdapter to AspectAdapter?
dimitris Apr 21, 2005 1:08 PM (in response to bill.burke)A good name will help you understand what it does, without having to look deep into it. A bad name will just confuse you.
Humpty dumpty will haunt me :)