This content has been marked as final.
Show 5 replies
-
1. Re: Consider using shorter filenames....
adrian.brock Jul 3, 2007 4:57 PM (in response to juha)"juha@jboss.org" wrote:
... the latest Cygwin update dies with ManagedObjectsWithTransientAttachmentsImplTransientManagedObjectUnitTestCase.java.svn-base': File name too long
You're still using FAT. Yuck! :-) -
2. Re: Consider using shorter filenames....
alesj Jul 3, 2007 5:15 PM (in response to juha)What's the longest you can grasp? ;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table
Wow ... FAT ~ Bill Gates ... didn't know that. -
3. Re: Consider using shorter filenames....
adrian.brock Jul 3, 2007 5:26 PM (in response to juha)~256 characters including directory name.
-
4. Re: Consider using shorter filenames....
juha Jul 3, 2007 6:47 PM (in response to juha)"adrian@jboss.org" wrote:
"juha@jboss.org" wrote:
... the latest Cygwin update dies with ManagedObjectsWithTransientAttachmentsImplTransientManagedObjectUnitTestCase.java.svn-base': File name too long
You're still using FAT. Yuck! :-)
I'm not. I think it's Cygwin using the obsolete API calls. -
5. Re: Consider using shorter filenames....
bill.burke Jul 5, 2007 3:10 PM (in response to juha)This has got to be the most hilarious discussion in awhile....