-
1. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
thomas.diesler Mar 11, 2005 4:08 AM (in response to jcrume)Yes, the JBossWS rewrite is all about that. For status and roadmap, checkout
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS -
2. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 13, 2005 6:19 PM (in response to jcrume)Sweet! Is there anything to download to start trying some of this stuff out?
Thanks!
Jim -
3. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
thomas.diesler Mar 13, 2005 6:41 PM (in response to jcrume)cvs co jboss-head
cd jboss-head
build/build.sh
cd jboss-head/webservice
ant deploy-jbossws
run.sh
cd jboss-head/webservice/test
ant tests -
4. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 14, 2005 3:26 PM (in response to jcrume)Is this a build of JBoss 4.0.1, and can I run the EJB 3.0 project modules with it? As you can see, I'm trying to get to an implementation of J2EE 5.
Thanks!
Jim -
5. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jason.greene Mar 15, 2005 4:53 PM (in response to jcrume)Yes head is JBoss 5, which will be a J2EE 1.5 implementation, so it contains ejb3. This is a development branch, so dont expect stability or completeness.
There is also a preview release of ejb3 you can get from the download page.
Thanks,
-Jason -
6. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 16, 2005 7:51 AM (in response to jcrume)Thanks, Jason. I will download it and build it!
I've actually been using the ejb 3.0 previews, and stabilit asn't been bad at all! But I understand the nature of development branches. If I find any problems, I'll just look at the filed bugs first, then file one if it hasn't been yet.
THere is also a JBossWS 2.0 Alpha activity out there that I believe has the J2EE 5 web services standard implemented in it. I'm fairly new to JBoss, and I guess I'm having a little trouble following the roadmap.
Any information is appreciated!
Thanks!
Jim -
7. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
thomas.diesler Mar 16, 2005 3:55 PM (in response to jcrume)
I'm having a little trouble following the roadmap.
We all have ;-)
It good to have you look at our new stuff. -
8. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 16, 2005 7:02 PM (in response to jcrume)I have downloaded jboss-head using cvs. I am running windows, so I run build\build.bat and nothing sems to happen, or if does, it is REALLY FAST. Any ideas?
-
9. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 16, 2005 8:37 PM (in response to jcrume)I figured it out. The instructions say to cd to the jboss-head dir, then run build/build.sh. Since this is windows, first of all you run build.bat. Second of all, you have to cd to the build dir for it to work.
Sorry for the false alarm.
Jim -
10. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 17, 2005 8:13 AM (in response to jcrume)OK, I've successfully built JBoss 5. When it startes up, it gets a warning, and a stack trace to go along with it. It appears to be an old friend from 4.0.1RC1 where if you didn't remove remoting, you got this. I have looked, and the old remoting-service.xml is not there, so I'm not sure if or how I shold remove remoting. Any ideas? Thanks! Jim
Following is the warning and the first part of the stack trace:
07:49:44,130 WARN [Connector] Error registering invoker org.jboss.remoting.tran
sport.socket.SocketServerInvoker@1be8711 with MBeanServer.
javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: jboss.remoting:service=invoker,
transport=socket already registered.
at org.jboss.mx.server.registry.BasicMBeanRegistry.add(BasicMBeanRegistr
y.java:755)
at org.jboss.mx.server.registry.BasicMBeanRegistry.registerMBean(BasicMB
eanRegistry.java:211)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatch
er.java:144)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractIntercept
or.java:121)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelM
BeanOperationInterceptor.java:131)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.
java:246)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl$3.run(MBeanServerImpl.java:1407)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBean(MBeanServerImpl.jav
a:1402)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBean(MBeanServerImpl.jav
a:361)
at org.jboss.remoting.transport.Connector.start(Connector.java:246)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
sorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatch
er.java:144)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractIntercept
or.java:121)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelM
BeanOperationInterceptor.java:131)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74) -
11. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
rimmeraj Mar 17, 2005 11:31 AM (in response to jcrume)This is only a warning. It has been fixed in CVS head branch
-
12. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jcrume Mar 17, 2005 12:30 PM (in response to jcrume)Unless it was fixed today..... My download of the jboss-head is from last evening around 9PM est.... But understood, it is just a warning, and I should be able to work with it.
Jim -
13. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
rimmeraj Mar 17, 2005 1:54 PM (in response to jcrume)Check remoting/src/main/org/jboss/remoting/transport/Connector.java you need version 1.26
-
14. Re: JSR181/JSR224 Support
jason.greene Mar 17, 2005 2:04 PM (in response to jcrume)anonymous cvs lags at least 4 hours behind current head
-Jason