This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: Don't want to hard code the dynamic IP for @RemoteBindin
jaikiran Dec 19, 2008 10:57 AM (in response to slimamar)Looks related to this http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=146770
-
2. Re: Don't want to hard code the dynamic IP for @RemoteBindin
alrubinger Dec 19, 2008 2:04 PM (in response to slimamar)Please create a JIRA for this as a feature request under EJBTHREE.
S,
ALR -
3. Re: Don't want to hard code the dynamic IP for @RemoteBindin
slimamar Dec 22, 2008 6:03 AM (in response to slimamar)A JIRA has been created :
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1650
It's not a feature request but a bug because with this restriction in JBoss5.0.0GA
it's impossible to have multiple remoting binds for an EJB. -
4. Re: Don't want to hard code the dynamic IP for @RemoteBindin
alrubinger Dec 22, 2008 7:24 PM (in response to slimamar)"slimamar" wrote:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1650
Thank you for opening this. I've deprioritized it from critical, changed from "bug" to "feature request", and renamed "Need EL-replacement within @RemoteBinding.clientBindUrl so connect addresses are not hardcoded"."slimamar" wrote:
it's impossible to have multiple remoting binds for an EJB.
Nope, you can have as many @RemoteBindings as you want. However you must currently denote an explicit address within clientBindUrl (if it's specified). @see my comments in the JIRA for workarounds.
S,
ALR