This content has been marked as final.
Show 5 replies
-
1. Re: Remoting, XNIO and JBoss 5.1.0 GA
dmlloyd Jun 1, 2009 10:03 AM (in response to xmedeko)Remoting 2.5.1 uses plain sockets. You can remove XNIO from your deploy and deployers folders if you wish; but the beans it defines are all "on-demand" so I wouldn't expect a huge savings in startup time or memory footprint. If you do see a difference of more than a few milliseconds, please let me know.
-
2. Re: Remoting, XNIO and JBoss 5.1.0 GA
xmedeko Jun 1, 2009 10:11 AM (in response to xmedeko)28s:719ms vs. 26s:594msm so more than 2 seconds faster. I have removed XNIO from deploy and deployers as well.
But I have made just one experiment, thought. -
3. Re: Remoting, XNIO and JBoss 5.1.0 GA
dmlloyd Jun 1, 2009 10:12 AM (in response to xmedeko)Hmmm, interesting. That's substantially different from my experiments. Thanks for the info.
-
4. Re: Remoting, XNIO and JBoss 5.1.0 GA
xmedeko Jun 1, 2009 10:23 AM (in response to xmedeko)Hmm, I have made 3 more experiments and the time oscillates between 26s and 28s does not matter if with XNIO or without.
-
5. Re: Remoting, XNIO and JBoss 5.1.0 GA
dmlloyd Jun 1, 2009 10:53 AM (in response to xmedeko)Ah, ok, that explains it.