4 Replies Latest reply on May 10, 2005 5:37 AM by julien1

2.0 release candidate

julien1 May 8, 2005 1:59 PM

[JBPORTAL-105] - Administrator should be able to edit a user profile
[JBPORTAL-205] - Declarative way to define registration parameters
[JBPORTAL-215] - ssl for user login
[JBPORTAL-238] - Fix Forums/CMS/AdminCMS Portlet in normal mode.
[JBPORTAL-244] - JBoss Portal bridge
[JBPTL-17] - Theme API
[JBPTL-32] - Group module port
[JBPTL-33] - User module port
[JBPTL-39] - Project documentation
[JBPTL-58] - Permission management

Bug
- [JBPORTAL-190] - User with no role generates an error
- [JBPORTAL-194] - When using an IP that isn't localhost, the Admin CMS Portlet is empty due to incorrect portlet.xml entry
- [JBPORTAL-201] - NPE if a portlet declares a locale that is not supported by the OS
- [JBPORTAL-209] - setContentType() with encoding not supported
- [JBPORTAL-212] - portlet resource bundle was not loaded correctly
- [JBPORTAL-217] - Reply with quote is not working
- [JBPORTAL-227] - Quote a Message
- [JBPORTAL-228] - Reply to Message
- [JBPORTAL-229] - BB.Quote code
- [JBPORTAL-239] - Bug in org.jboss.portlet.forums.impl.ForumsModuleImpl
  
  Task
  - [JBPORTAL-79] - Create DDL file to update tables from Nukes
  - [JBPORTAL-187] - JBoss Portal setup the database and files on deploy
  - [JBPORTAL-203] - Change portal URL style to play nice with https and servlet container authentication
  - [JBPORTAL-219] - See new posts
  - [JBPORTAL-222] - Announcements and sticky posts
  - [JBPORTAL-223] - Edit a message
  - [JBPORTAL-225] - Window state strategy pluggable
  - [JBPORTAL-230] - Simplified deployment layer
  - [JBPORTAL-232] - Slide logging integration
  - [JBPTL-11] - Parser framework
  - [JBPTL-15] - Use java.util.regex
  - [JBPTL-28] - NukesPortlet
  - [JBPTL-34] - JSR-168 API javadoc
    
    Patch
    - [JBPORTAL-202] - Not setting the content type before setting the portlet mode on a RenderURL (and ActionURL) leads to a NPE
      
      thanks for the feedback

1. Re: 2.0 release candidate

garu May 9, 2005 2:15 AM (in response to julien1)

Do you mean it won't work with 4.0.2 final relased last week?
If not, are you going to release a bundle for it?
In alternative, forgive me if it is a stupid question, it's the first time i'm looking into portal, can we alter manually somehow the configuration to adapt for 4.0.2?
Thanks, Gabriele
Actions
2. Re: 2.0 release candidate

julien1 May 9, 2005 6:05 AM (in response to julien1)

Final will work with 4.0.2 (scheduled beginning of June)

Yes we are going to pack a release for 2.0 release candidate as well as for 2.0 final.

You can do it for 4.0.2, the bug thing is the migration from hibernate 2 to hibernate 3. We are going to start the migration this week in the CVS tree. You can help you know that by the way.
Actions
3. Re: 2.0 release candidate

lujhuang May 10, 2005 5:33 AM (in response to julien1)

I followed the jboss portal rc-1 installation instruction to configure the mysql db (4.1.11), but got these errors:

mysql> source setup.ddl;
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FKF606014114931AFE' at line 1
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FKF410173894E6A686' at line 1
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FKF410173894E6B1C9' at line 1
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FK93CC44D0C691B5FF' at line 1
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FK97AA4873FAF7DF89' at line 1
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FKC496306482E27870' at line 1
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syn
tax to use near 'constraint FK93CC461094E6B1C9' at line 1
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.02 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.09 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.09 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.09 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.23 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.13 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

mysql> select version();
+-----------+
| version() |
+-----------+
| 4.1.11-nt |
+-----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> show tables;
+--------------------------+
| Tables_in_jbossportal |
+--------------------------+
| jbp_role_membership |
| jbp_roles |
| jbp_user_pref |
| jbp_user_pref_prop_value |
| jbp_user_pref_set |
| jbp_user_prop |
| jbp_users |
+--------------------------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Actions
4. Re: 2.0 release candidate

julien1 May 10, 2005 5:37 AM (in response to julien1)

it seems good anyway.

the errors you are seing are related to the fact that it tries to remove first any existing table and it cannot do it.
Actions

Go to original post