-
1. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
gavin.king Dec 14, 2006 4:27 AM (in response to popcorn09)Seam does not really support EJB2. However, you can certainly call an EJB2 component from a Seam component.
I don't know of any reason why Seam won't work in JBoss 4.0.3 if you are not using EJB3 (but I still recommend the upgrade to 4.0.5). EJB3 is certainly not a requirement for Seam.
Also we don't recommend the use of Tomahawk (with or without Seam). -
2. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
popcorn09 Dec 14, 2006 4:37 AM (in response to popcorn09)"gavin.king@jboss.com" wrote:
Seam does not really support EJB2. However, you can certainly call an EJB2 component from a Seam component.
Can I find any resources on that?I don't know of any reason why Seam won't work in JBoss 4.0.3 if you are not using EJB3 (but I still recommend the upgrade to 4.0.5). EJB3 is certainly not a requirement for Seam.
Which version of Seam would work with JBoss 4.0.3 SP1?Also we don't recommend the use of Tomahawk (with or without Seam).
Why is that so?
Thanks -
3. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
gavin.king Dec 14, 2006 4:41 AM (in response to popcorn09)Which version of Seam would work with JBoss 4.0.3 SP1?
1.1.0.GAWhy is that so?
It's buggy and low-quality and does arbitrary things with the JSF lifecycle. There are MUCH superior JSF libraries available. -
4. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
popcorn09 Dec 14, 2006 4:49 AM (in response to popcorn09)It's buggy and low-quality and does arbitrary things with the JSF lifecycle. There are MUCH superior JSF libraries available.
Other that the opinion, can you lead me to any resources that certify that JBoss and tomahawk would not work together? What kind of problems it leads to and workarounds/fixes, if any?
Thanks. -
5. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
gavin.king Dec 14, 2006 4:51 AM (in response to popcorn09)Search this forum.
-
6. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
popcorn09 Dec 14, 2006 5:02 AM (in response to popcorn09)Well I cannot find any specific where things were breaking because of tomahawk. It is usually because people can't configure it correctly and ask for help here instead of asking on the myfaces mailing list. I do not think that is enough reason to certify a framework as poor quality.
I have tried IceFaces too. It was far more buggy.
Just my 2 cents.
Thanks for your help. -
7. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
pmuir Dec 14, 2006 5:11 AM (in response to popcorn09)I would recommend trinidad. I've had no problems with it & Seam.
-
8. Re: JBoss Seam version compatibility
popcorn09 Dec 14, 2006 5:13 AM (in response to popcorn09)I will try that once I port the existing app from tomahawk to trinidad. Thanks. :)