This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: pages.xml Versus *.jpdl.xml
gavin.king Feb 13, 2007 1:39 PM (in response to tiomalandra)They are just different approaches. jBPM pageflows are more powerful, but more difficult to use. Many problems can be elegantly solved with either model.
-
2. Re: pages.xml Versus *.jpdl.xml
pmuir Feb 13, 2007 5:31 PM (in response to tiomalandra)My rule of thumb is to use a pageflow where there is a natural flow (often some sort of wizard) - the user wants to be able to work their way through solving a complex problem. On the other hand pages.xml is brilliant for even the most complex (in my book lots of tabs) CRUD.
I really like being able to start a pageflow in pages.xml :) -
3. Re: pages.xml Versus *.jpdl.xml
gavin.king Feb 13, 2007 6:10 PM (in response to tiomalandra)Yes, these are the intended usecases. Note that pages.xml is RESTful, pageflows are not.