-
1. Re: Memory leak and development status
tom.baeyens Oct 19, 2007 8:20 AM (in response to mvaldes)maybe we need to sit together before we start on task, identity and security.
-
2. Re: Memory leak and development status
mvaldes Oct 19, 2007 10:26 AM (in response to mvaldes)I agree. Would be great to also invite Inria folks.
The main issue will be to find a date.
In November I will be traveling until 20th (probably too late for this meeting).
I guess Pierre will be available earlier November so you can start without me but I think would be great If I could attend.
What about you François ? Tom ?
regards,
Miguel Valdes -
3. Re: Memory leak and development status
charoy Oct 19, 2007 10:49 AM (in response to mvaldes)A meeting would be nice but november is a very busy month for me. I can find space for a one day trip if it's enough
regards
François -
4. Re: Memory leak and development status
mvaldes Oct 19, 2007 10:54 AM (in response to mvaldes)I'll be available on November 8th and 9th but I have a constraint on 9th evening. Would be fine if the meeting is in Grenoble.
François would you be available one of those dates ?
Tom?
regards,
Miguel Valdes -
5. Re: Memory leak and development status
tom.baeyens Oct 19, 2007 11:31 AM (in response to mvaldes)if it's possible to have the meeting in the airport of Lyon, it's possible for me november 8th.
i could arrive around 10:30 and have to check back in around 5pm
we can't postpone longer then that, i have to get started by that time. -
6. Re: Memory leak and development status
mvaldes Oct 19, 2007 12:36 PM (in response to mvaldes)Works for me
I can even check whether we can go to the Lyon Bull offices for this meeting (I will check how much time will take from the airport).
Otherwise we can just meet in one of the bar/restaurants (not really confortable :-)
François could you confirm your availability ?
regards,
Miguel Valdes -
7. Re: Memory leak and development status
mvaldes Oct 23, 2007 9:27 AM (in response to mvaldes)Tom
I was on the phone with François. He could take a train on wednesday evening. However the must leave on thuersday at 15:30, could we start the meeting a bit earlier than 10:30 ?
BTW, concerning the memory leak when stressing the BPEL extension, our test team (supported by Charles) found the issue. The problem was in the threading model and not in the PVM. It has been fixed.
regards,
Miguel Valdes -
8. Re: Memory leak and development status
tom.baeyens Oct 23, 2007 9:33 AM (in response to mvaldes)"mvaldes" wrote:
I was on the phone with François. He could take a train on wednesday evening. However the must leave on thuersday at 15:30, could we start the meeting a bit earlier than 10:30 ?
let's do the rest of the meeting appointments by email."mvaldes" wrote:
BTW, concerning the memory leak when stressing the BPEL extension, our test team (supported by Charles) found the issue. The problem was in the threading model and not in the PVM. It has been fixed.
awsome. congrats to team and Charles for tackling the hardest type of problems. -
9. Re: Memory leak and development status
tom.baeyens Oct 23, 2007 9:55 AM (in response to mvaldes)i added my initial ideas and requirements of the task component here:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097900#4097900