-
1. Re: And the Vote is...
nickarls Dec 1, 2009 9:07 AM (in response to nickarls)Although I have a hard time understanding the stance of IBM. First people specify a Mercedes. Then someone is dissatisfied with the color and creates the specs for a Wartburg. Then IBM thinks the two should be welded (no pun intended) together. Then they complain that the
aesthetic problems
of having a Wart hanging on a Mercedes hasn't been solved. No $hit, Sherlock? -
2. Re: And the Vote is...
nickarls Dec 1, 2009 9:13 AM (in response to nickarls)And the voting process should add another option, B4B (Bad for Business) so SpringSource would finally be able to vote! ;-) Or perhaps they have forgot the password? Nah, they remembered to vote for 330...
-
3. Re: And the Vote is...
swd847 Dec 1, 2009 9:40 AM (in response to nickarls)Does it still pass even with IBM's no vote?
-
4. Re: And the Vote is...
nickarls Dec 1, 2009 9:42 AM (in response to nickarls)Yes, it's majority voting so no problem, just some general ranting on their vote ;-)
-
5. Re: And the Vote is...
asookazian Dec 2, 2009 12:22 AM (in response to nickarls)As long as it passes and 299 is injected into the SE/EE communities, isn't that good enough for the 1st round?
But if 299/CDI supports SE and EE, then why is there a need for 330?
-
6. Re: And the Vote is...
luxspes Dec 2, 2009 12:40 AM (in response to nickarls)
Arbi Sookazian wrote on Dec 02, 2009 00:22:
But if 299/CDI supports SE and EE, then why is there a need for 330?AFAIKT because the Spring guys did not like 299, so they created they own... politics and economics, the 2 forces that truly shape software: engineering is nothing when compared to them... ;-)