deploying service-assembly to 3.4.0.0 causes 100% CPU usage

[newion]

I switched to 3.4.0.0 and after deploying my service-assembly, Servicemix is consuming 100% of my CPU. I don't know what to do now...

[davestanley]

It would be useful to try and capture a thread dump for the process and attach it here.

>kill -3 /data directory and restart the container. Also what OS are you using?

Regards

/Dave

[newion]

Before reading your post I managed to debug Servicemix in Eclipse and find affected thread.

Take a look here:

http://picasaweb.google.pl/Pablo.Kaczor/Fuse?authkey=CPC-ZSdTd4I#5288591846623499154

You can zoom image and drag to see more detailed picture.

Generally the loop can not break because the condition while(activeEndpoints > 0) is always true (activeEndpoint = 1) and channel.accept() throws OperationNotSupportedException... because it is EndpointDeliveryChannel..

I suppose there is something wrong with my CXF SE component. But it was working with 3.3.1.6...

Thanks for help.

In the log I found this:

org.apache.cxf.configuration.spring.ConfigurerImpl getBeanName

INFO: Could not determine bean name for instance of class org.apache.cxf.transport.jbi.JBIDestination.

org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServerImpl initDestination

INFO: Setting the server's publish address to be jbi://ID-192-168-10-10-11eb57b288e-8-0

Edited by: newion on Jan 8, 2009 4:07 AM

While the application starts without problems on 3.3.1.6, there is an error on 3.3.1.8:

Caused by: org.apache.cxf.BusException: No DestinationFactory was found for the

namespace http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/.

        at org.apache.cxf.transport.DestinationFactoryManagerImpl.getDestination

Factory(DestinationFactoryManagerImpl.java:106)

        at org.apache.cxf.frontend.AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.createEndpoi

ntInfo(AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.java:248)

        at org.apache.cxf.frontend.AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.createEndpoi

nt(AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.java:144)

        at org.apache.cxf.frontend.ServerFactoryBean.create(ServerFactoryBean.ja

va:114)

Edited by: newion on Jan 8, 2009 5:05 AM

[davestanley]

Thanks for posting your analysis. I will let you know if I have any luck in reproducing it.

Regards

/Dave