QEbalunasj
:
Alex is not online yet, but we can get started I think
[
11:03am
]
amarkhel joined the chat room.
[
11:03am
]
amarkhel
:
hi
[
11:03am
]
nbelaevski
:
hello all
[
11:03am
]
balunasj
:
amarkhel: hi
[
11:04am
]
•
balunasj
 
thinking it is just easier to follow nicks lead
[
11:04am
]
abelevich joined the chat room.
[
11:04am
]
balunasj
:
hello all
[
11:04am
]
abelevich
:
hello
[
11:05am
]
balunasj
:
lets start with QE status on testing
[
11:05am
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: do you want to summarize?
[
11:05am
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: it might be a better idea to get going on JOPR first so that ccrouch and smcgowan dont need to be here all time
[
11:05am
]
prabhat
:
balunasj:
[
11:05am
]
ilya_shaikovsky joined the chat room.
[
11:05am
]
ilya_shaikovsky
:
hi All!
[
11:05am
]
prabhat
:
lfryc: you want to start on JOPR & RF status
[
11:06am
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: yeah that is fine, I figured they waited long enough the could wait a little longer
[
11:06am
]
lfryc
:
prabhat: no, I don't want
[
11:06am
]
lfryc
:
prabhat: just joking
[
11:06am
]
balunasj
:
it is all part of QE status so that is fine
[
11:06am
]
balunasj
:
lfryc: insubordinate ......
[
11:06am
]
lfryc
:
JOPR status - we already prepared automated jsfunit tests in basic (non-jsf2 configurationg)
[
11:07am
]
lfryc
:
but I failed to configure JSF2 profile - I ask for this smcgowan because it was too many dependencies which i doesnt know
[
11:08am
]
lfryc
:
smcgowan: can you continue what you found the last week?
[
11:08am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasJ:  i need to get an AS6; i.e., jbossas/trunk build that will handle the admin-console deployment
[
11:09am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: and then update it with JSF2 jars, and adjust admin-console dependencies right?
[
11:09am
]
smcgowan
:
currenltly there is an issue with: the version of el that is being used resulting in: [ClassLoaderManager] Unexpected error during load of:javax.el.ELResolver
[
11:09am
]
smcgowan
:
java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader (instance of org/jboss/classloader/spi/base/BaseClassLoader) previously initiated loading for a different type with name "javax/el/ELResolver"
[
11:09am
]
smcgowan
:
it looks like you bring in the dependency for el with richfaces and i'm not sure it is the latest version
[
11:09am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: ok - this is why you were asking about version of EL we use - right?
[
11:10am
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: ilya_shaikovsky , Konstantin1 : any of you know the version EL 3.3.3 depends on without going to look it up?
[
11:10am
]
smcgowan
:
specifically, jboss-el-1.0_02.CR2.jar
[
11:10am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: what is JOPR using ?
[
11:10am
]
balunasj
:
or expecting
[
11:10am
]
lfryc
:
smcgowan: do you already tried it with 3.3.3.Beta1 or did you just jars provided by me?
[
11:11am
]
smcgowan
:
lfryc:  i used the SNAPSHOT
[
11:11am
]
smcgowan
:
3.3.3-jsf2-SNAPSHOT
[
11:11am
]
prabhat
:
smcgowan: does not AS come with EL jar in it similar to jsf jars?
[
11:11am
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: checking...
[
11:12am
]
lfryc
:
balunasj: nbelaevski we both used the snapshots libs, compiled from 3.3.X_JSF2 branch
[
11:12am
]
balunasj
:
that branch has been merged to 3.3.X
[
11:12am
]
balunasj
:
and should be working with that branch
[
11:13am
]
lfryc
:
balunasj: yeah, but not so the last week... we started with libs before the merge (I just want to make it sure)
[
11:14am
]
balunasj
:
lfryc: ok, but the release testing should be with the BETA1 jars correct?
[
11:14am
]
balunasj
:
Konstantin1 built from http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/richfaces/branches/community/3.3.X/
[
11:14am
]
lfryc
:
balunasj: yeah, sure
[
11:14am
]
balunasj
:
lfryc: ok good
[
11:14am
]
smcgowan
:
from lfryc:
[
11:14am
]
smcgowan
:
Nov 25 11:19:43 <lfryc_home>    [INFO] +- antlr:antlr:jar:2.7.6:provided
[
11:14am
]
smcgowan
:
Nov 25 11:19:43 <lfryc_home>    [INFO] +- org.jboss.seam:jboss-seam:jar:2.1.0.SP1:provided
[
11:14am
]
smcgowan
:
org.richfaces.ui:editor:jar:3.3.3-SNAPSHOT
[
11:14am
]
smcgowan
:
Nov 25 11:19:43 <lfryc_home>    [INFO] |  \- org.jboss.el:jboss-el:jar:1.0_02.CR2:provided
[
11:15am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: what version of jboss-el is AS6/admin-console using/expecting?
[
11:15am
]
nbelaevski
:
smcgowan: editor should not be a dependency of anything - it's not a release artifact but internal Maven module
[
11:16am
]
nbelaevski
:
smcgowan: it should be org.richfaces.ui:richfaces-ui
[
11:16am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: if we need to update to it we'll need to discuss, although I would hope we would be pretty agnostic to that change, and not need to package.
[
11:16am
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: good point
[
11:16am
]
balunasj
:
I think that was from lfryc looking for the dependency - right?
[
11:17am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasj:  yes, it was just looking for where the dependency was coming from
[
11:17am
]
smcgowan
:
but, i need to look further at this - was hoping ssilvert would know
[
11:18am
]
nbelaevski
:
smcgowan: Seam includes el-api as a dependency, that's true. but it shouldn't be exported with RF artifacts
[
11:19am
]
smcgowan
:
nvelaevski:  that's basically where the discussion was left before the US holiday break
[
11:19am
]
nbelaevski
:
all: I remember there was an issue with exclusions in 3.3.x_JSF2 branch... one exclusion was incorrect and I didn't fix that because 3.3.x_JSF2 is not a release thing
[
11:20am
]
nbelaevski
:
probably, that's the cause
[
11:20am
]
prabhat
:
lfryc: but last test you ran with JOPR was not from JSF branch but from 3.3.X, right?
[
11:20am
]
balunasj
:
amarkhel: do you remember the exclusion?
[
11:21am
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: I remember, that's in rf-demo
[
11:21am
]
nbelaevski
:
        <exclusion>
[
11:21am
]
nbelaevski
:
          <artifactId>javax.el</artifactId>
[
11:21am
]
nbelaevski
:
          <groupId>el-api</groupId>
[
11:21am
]
nbelaevski
:
        </exclusion>
[
11:21am
]
nbelaevski
:
artifactId <-> groupId
[
11:21am
]
lfryc
:
prabhat: No, the branch wasn't ready since I can force the tests again...
[
11:21am
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: ok
[
11:22am
]
smcgowan
:
for lfryc's testing, however, i think the best test env is to use 6.0.0.M1 which should be released by Wednesday and just replace the current MyFaces impl with RF update
[
11:22am
]
smcgowan
:
and then we need to stabilize jbossas/trunk -
[
11:23am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: but isn't that JSF 1.2?
[
11:23am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: are there other changes needed in admin-console for JSF2?
[
11:23am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasj: correct,
[
11:24am
]
smcgowan
:
let's ask ccrouch?
[
11:24am
]
ccrouch
:
smcgowan: re: el, it doesnt look like embjopr pulls in a particular version
[
11:24am
]
ccrouch
:
i assume it picks one up transitively via the Seam dependency
[
11:24am
]
ccrouch
:
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/embjopr/trunk/core/pom.xml
[
11:24am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch: right, embjopr does not
[
11:24am
]
nbelaevski
:
while documentation is pending, let me clarify on this: org.richfaces.framework:richfaces-impl-jsf2 should be added to pom.xml explicitly
[
11:25am
]
nbelaevski
:
in the past it was transitively added with richfaces-ui, now it's necessary to select one explicitly
[
11:25am
]
balunasj
:
and it replaces the regular richfaces-impl
[
11:25am
]
nbelaevski
:
yes, richfaces-impl should be removed and richfaces-impl-jsf2 added
[
11:26am
]
nbelaevski
:
and preexisting projects will need explicit addition of richfaces-impl or richfaces-impl-jsf2 to pom.xml if there were none of then
[
11:26am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: is there a lot of work for converting admin-console to JSF2 or just update pom?
[
11:28am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: then update to mvn artifact as nbelaevski shows and you should be using JSF2 and Richfaces with JSF2 support
[
11:28am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: we did some fixes for jsf2 as part of the 5.2 work
[
11:28am
]
ccrouch
:
my understanding was that the next step was a functional RF version working with JSF2
[
11:29am
]
ccrouch
:
testing could then continue using that, to see if other fixes were needed
[
11:30am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch, balunasj:  that's my understanding as well
[
11:30am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: ok and the BETA1 is testing is that release ( or at least the beta of it
[
11:30am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: smcgowan : we wanted someone from the JOPR team to try out the BETA1 jars before we "ship" next week
[
11:30am
]
balunasj
:
to catch any major items.
[
11:31am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasJ;  i informally took that task on working with lfryc
[
11:31am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: right and thanks
[
11:31am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: so we should try RF version "3.3.3-jsf2-SNAPSHOT"
[
11:31am
]
nbelaevski
:
we have a version of RF 3.3.x that we tested under JSF2 and it contains of three Maven modules
[
11:32am
]
nbelaevski
:
org.richfaces.framework:richfaces-api:3.3.3-SNAPSHOT
[
11:32am
]
nbelaevski
:
org.richfaces.framework:richfaces-impl-jsf2
[
11:32am
]
lfryc
:
ccrouch: no, its deprecated, built from the old (pre-release) branch
[
11:32am
]
nbelaevski
:
org.richfaces.ui:richfaces-ui:3.3.3-SNAPSHOT
[
11:33am
]
ccrouch
:
ok, so the version is "3.3.3-SNAPSHOT" ?
[
11:33am
]
nbelaevski
:
ccrouch: yes
[
11:33am
]
ccrouch
:
got ya cool
[
11:33am
]
nbelaevski
:
ccrouch: artifactId for JSF2 version of richfaces-impl has changed
[
11:33am
]
ccrouch
:
have you guys tested with a version of Seam ?
[
11:33am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: that should be the same thing ( basically ) as what is being tested for BETA
[
11:34am
]
nbelaevski
:
ccrouch: Seam is used at livedemo, however the usage is somewhat basical there
[
11:34am
]
ccrouch
:
nbelaevski: got ya, i see the change "-jjsf2"
[
11:34am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: yes the in the live demo
[
11:34am
]
ccrouch
:
nbelaevski: ok, which version of Seam ?
[
11:34am
]
nbelaevski
:
2.2.0.GA
[
11:35am
]
smcgowan
:
right, so seam with admin-console is 2.1.0.SP1
[
11:35am
]
nbelaevski
:
smcgowan: we used 2.1.0.SP1 initially, then decided to upgrade to the later version
[
11:35am
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: I would be surprised if there was an incompatiblity here.
[
11:36am
]
balunasj
:
sorry I meant smcgowan and ccrouch
[
11:36am
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: I agree, it should work with both
[
11:36am
]
ccrouch
:
ok good to know
[
11:37am
]
ccrouch
:
which version of jsf-api is JBAS6.x shipping with currently?
[
11:37am
]
smcgowan
:
>2.0.1-FCS
[
11:37am
]
smcgowan
:
jsf-api version ^^
[
11:37am
]
nbelaevski
:
smcgowan: the same as ours
[
11:38am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: good
[
11:38am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: smcgowan :ssilvert : so what other work was done to get myfaces isolated?  does that need to be pulled out?
[
11:39am
]
balunasj
:
basically you guys should be running off the AS JSF impl update the richfaces impl version as above
[
11:39am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasj:  it's all done in EMBJOPR currently
[
11:39am
]
balunasj
:
and hopefully that would work.
[
11:39am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: not sure I know the implications of that?
[
11:39am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: is that separate from the admin-console? or the same?
[
11:40am
]
ccrouch
:
any likely problems there
[
11:40am
]
ccrouch
:
one more thing facelets, we're using <facelets.version>1.1.15.B1</facelets.version>
[
11:40am
]
•
balunasj
 
something I've wondered for a while
[
11:40am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasj:  basically we need to replace myfaces with your latest richfaces
[
11:40am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: EMBJOPR is the upstream for the Admin Console in EAP, no significant differences
[
11:40am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: with JSF 2 facelets is should be supported, but JSF 2 comes with its own.
[
11:40am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch, smcgowan : ok
[
11:41am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: but it should work fine with that facelets version
[
11:41am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: so its ok we keep shipping with 1.1.15.B1?
[
11:42am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: JSF 2.0 should be backwards compatible to that - although I believe there is a context-param that may need to be set
[
11:42am
]
ssilvert
:
balunasj: If i remember correctly, the only thing was to include MyFaces and its dependencies.  And you set WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL in web.xml.
[
11:43am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  that brings up a question for me, when moving to jbossas/trunk should embjopr also upgrade to Seam 2.2.0.GA?
[
11:43am
]
balunasj
:
ssilvert: do you remember if there is a context-param to use facelets in JSF 2?
[
11:43am
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: yes, there's context-param that will switch built-in Facelets view handler - it should be used
[
11:43am
]
ssilvert
:
jbalunasj: you only set the context-param if you want to bundle old Facelets
[
11:43am
]
ssilvert
:
By default it will use the JSF2 Facelets
[
11:43am
]
balunasj
:
ssilvert: that is what ccrouch and the admin console are doing
[
11:44am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: correct
[
11:44am
]
ccrouch
:
ssilvert: do we know how JSF2 Facelets compares to our version?
[
11:45am
]
ssilvert
:
It should be backwards compatible, but test, test, test....
[
11:45am
]
ccrouch
:
re: ripping out MyFaces we should be able to do the reverse of what we did a couple of weeks ago to include it
[
11:45am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: ccrouch : ssilvert : let get back to estimates and expectations for RF 3.3.3.BETA1
[
11:46am
]
balunasj
:
just because it is very late in Minsk and we need to cover other release items
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
ssilvert: I see things like
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
This is a special patched version of not-yet-released Facelets 1.1.15,
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
            which is required in order for Facelets to work in AS5.
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
            (see https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3066)
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
-->
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
<!--
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
<facelets.version>1.1.15.B1</facelets.version>
[
11:46am
]
ccrouch
:
sorry balunasj
[
11:46am
]
•
ccrouch
 
focuses
[
11:46am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: ccrouch : lfryc : with the information above and switching to http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/richfaces/framework/richfaces-impl-jsf2/ how much time do you think is needed to get the tests running?
[
11:46am
]
balunasj
:
+ some manual visual verification
[
11:47am
]
ccrouch
:
well we should be able to have a new build done in the next couple of days
[
11:47am
]
ccrouch
:
that we could hand off to QE
[
11:47am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: ok that would be good.  Ideally we would like to ship BETA1 next week
[
11:48am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: so any obvious or big issues should be known by then
[
11:48am
]
balunasj
:
then you and admin QE could cover in more detail for RF cR1
[
11:48am
]
ccrouch
:
smcgowan: do we have a tagged version of JBAS6 we can use to deploy into? Is M1 good enough?
[
11:49am
]
balunasj
:
we would like to release 3.3.3.GA in January ( early if possible ), but depends on issues found.
[
11:49am
]
ssilvert
:
ccrouch: I've used both JSF2 Facelets and 1.1.14.B1 Facelets on trunk.  Does that answer your question?
[
11:49am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  tagged but not yet released
[
11:49am
]
ssilvert
:
ccrouch: I've used both JSF2 Facelets and 1.1.15.B1 Facelets on trunk.  Does that answer your question?
[
11:49am
]
ssilvert
:
15 not 14
[
11:50am
]
ccrouch
:
ssilvert: thats sufficient reassurance to lets us continue ploughing into the unknown
[
11:50am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  i was targeting M1 for the RF testing, looks like there are other issues in current jbossas/trunk that would need resolution
[
11:50am
]
ccrouch
:
smcgowan: need resolution before you can test the console?
[
11:51am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  yes
[
11:51am
]
ccrouch
:
ok well there is your critical path item balunasj
[
11:51am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: smcgowan : ssilvert : what is the release plan for 6 M1?
[
11:51am
]
smcgowan
:
ok, hold on
[
11:51am
]
smcgowan
:
6.0.0.M1 was the old Branch_5_x
[
11:51am
]
smcgowan
:
the name change is confusing
[
11:51am
]
balunasj
:
will there be enough time for  RF 3.3.3.GA to get into admin-console?  Or is there going to be a followup release soon?
[
11:52am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: agree
[
11:52am
]
smcgowan
:
so, currently, with 6.0.0.M1 we have the admin-console using MyFaces
[
11:52am
]
smcgowan
:
we should be able to build embjopr with RF 3.3.3 and deploy to M1
[
11:52am
]
smcgowan
:
with a few other changes possibly
[
11:53am
]
smcgowan
:
then, that version should be deployable/integrated into jbossas/trunk
[
11:53am
]
balunasj
:
is there a M2 planned shortly after that this could be included with?
[
11:53am
]
smcgowan
:
M2 schedule is not created yet, but there will be one end of January 'ish as I understand it
[
11:54am
]
smcgowan
:
balunasj: and that is the goal
[
11:54am
]
balunasj
:
smcgowan: ok that should be good timing then so we'll target M@ for admin-console to include RF 3.3.3.GA,
[
11:54am
]
smcgowan
:
to provide an admin-console release w/o MyFaces
[
11:54am
]
smcgowan
:
yes
[
11:54am
]
smcgowan
:
i mentioned it at our staff meeting this morning
[
11:54am
]
balunasj
:
but we just need the testing done now because we can not ship another version of 3.3.X
[
11:54am
]
smcgowan
:
so jgreene is aware
[
11:54am
]
balunasj
:
we MUST move on to 4.0
[
11:54am
]
smcgowan
:
gotcha
[
11:55am
]
balunasj
:
ok good I think we are all on the same page with the jopr testing and plan
[
11:55am
]
balunasj
:
lfryc: smcgowan : ccrouch : please keep me updated on issues, or progress
[
11:55am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  does that plan sound good to you?
[
11:55am
]
lfryc
:
balunasj: I will do so, Jay..
[
11:55am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: smcgowan: the problem i understand it is we dont have a stable platform to test Console + RF
[
11:56am
]
ccrouch
:
"(10:50:19 AM) smcgowan: ccrouch:  i was targeting M1 for the RF testing, looks like there are other issues in current jbossas/trunk that would need resolution
[
11:56am
]
ccrouch
:
(10:50:40 AM) ccrouch: smcgowan: need resolution before you can test the console?
[
11:56am
]
ccrouch
:
(10:50:59 AM) smcgowan: ccrouch:  yes"
[
11:56am
]
smcgowan
:
6.0.0.M1 is stable  - jbossas/trunk is not
[
11:56am
]
ccrouch
:
ah ok
[
11:57am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: unfortunately we need to move on - can you guys investigate and just let us know what is needed?  lfryc will assist as well.
[
11:57am
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: correct if wrong
[
11:57am
]
ccrouch
:
smcgowan: so we can test console + RF3.3.3 + JBAS6-.0M1 ?
[
11:58am
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: lfryc will assist
[
11:58am
]
ccrouch
:
balunasj: ok will do, it sounds like it will be ok
[
11:58am
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: development was doing some development testing of 3.3.3 to assist - how is that going?
[
11:58am
]
balunasj
:
ccrouch: thanks I appreciate it.
[
11:58am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  that is that targeted config - we need to resove the el issue but I think we discussed that - i just need to test it out
[
11:58am
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: Alex has found some issues, that will be posted to JIRA
[
11:58am
]
ccrouch
:
smcgowan: ok cool
[
11:58am
]
nbelaevski
:
amarkhel: anything from your side?
[
11:59am
]
smcgowan
:
ccrouch:  so, ball in my court, and I'll ping you or Ian with my update
[
11:59am
]
balunasj
:
thanks smcgowan
[
11:59am
]
wesleyhales left the chat room.
[
12:00pm
]
amarkhel left the chat room. (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[
12:00pm
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: doh amarkhel fell off the chat
[
12:00pm
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: Andrei was disconnected, he says no issues were found
[
12:00pm
]
nbelaevski
:
balunasj: asked him offline
[
12:00pm
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: ok great!
[
12:01pm
]
balunasj
:
nothing alex found was major?
[
12:01pm
]
nbelaevski
:
seems nothing major
[
12:01pm
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: great
[
12:01pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: How about QE - would you like to give the general update?
[
12:02pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: so we have made some progress on IE testing. The Windows box that were given to us were not up to the mark for selenium. lfryc worked with IT folks on getting that resolved and we hope to see good pass rate with IE this week
[
12:03pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: there is an issue with patch testing that we need to consult with Alex Smirnoff
[
12:03pm
]
balunasj
:
ok good
[
12:03pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: yes we'll need to discuss that offline
[
12:03pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: yup
[
12:03pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: other than that we will get started with beta testing
[
12:04pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: please create a jira in RFPL for me and I will create subtasks for them for lfryc and ppitonak
[
12:04pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: ok
[
12:05pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: other than that not much to add from my side
[
12:05pm
]
balunasj
:
ok - and how long do you think your team will need for this testing - estimates?
[
12:06pm
]
nbelaevski
:
I have to leave - bye all
[
12:06pm
]
balunasj
:
nbelaevski: bye nick thaks
[
12:06pm
]
balunasj
:
thanks
[
12:06pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: we will try to do by Thursday but I would need to talk to my guys quickly about beta testing
[
12:07pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: ok
[
12:07pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: I had planned to do it today
[
12:07pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: I'll be traveling to JSFSummit tomorrow
[
12:07pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: but is that time line good fo ryou?
[
12:07pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: Nick will be back Wed to help with coordinating so that is fine.
[
12:08pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: just to be sure you mean thursday this week right?
[
12:08pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: ok..Friday the latest..at least that's the goal
[
12:08pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: lol yes
[
12:08pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: ok good
[
12:08pm
]
balunasj
:
[
12:08pm
]
balunasj
:
We'll discuss final release items later in the week then as we'll know more about the details
[
12:08pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: yup
[
12:09pm
]
prabhat
:
balunasj: so tagging and everything all good?
[
12:09pm
]
balunasj
:
prabhat: yes Konstantin1 should have already gotten the build out
[
12:09pm
]
balunasj
:
Konstantin1: when did you get the build out?
[
12:10pm
]
balunasj
:
I know there was some test issues too.
[
12:11pm
]
Konstantin1
:
on Friday
[
12:12pm
]
balunasj
:
Konstantin1: ok that is what I thought
[
12:13pm
]
balunasj
:
ok so we'll discuss the details of the release latest in the week - gtg - and thanks.  I'll post the minutes soon.