This content has been marked as final.
Show 10 replies
-
1. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
kabirkhan Oct 25, 2007 10:24 AM (in response to adrian.brock)Scott released Beta5 last week, and I am already depending on it in AOP
-
2. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
starksm64 Oct 25, 2007 12:30 PM (in response to adrian.brock)Yes it was released. I thought Ales was updating trunk to use this. If it has not been done I'll do it.
-
3. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
starksm64 Oct 25, 2007 1:05 PM (in response to adrian.brock)When I try to update to the 2.0.0.Beta5, there are compile problems with the ServiceMetaDataICF:
/home/svn/JBossHead/jboss-head/system-jmx/src/main/org/jboss/system/deployers/managed/ServiceMetaDataICF.java:47: org.jboss.system.deployers.managed.ServiceMetaDataICF is not abstract and does not override abstract method getComponentName(org.jboss.beans.info.spi.BeanInfo,org.jboss.managed.api.ManagedProperty,java.io.Serializable,org.jboss.metatype.api.values.MetaValue) in org.jboss.managed.spi.factory.InstanceClassFactory public class ServiceMetaDataICF
Ales was working on this so he will have to update the mc version and include his related changes. -
4. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
alesj Oct 25, 2007 5:45 PM (in response to adrian.brock)"scott.stark@jboss.org" wrote:
Ales was working on this so he will have to update the mc version and include his related changes.
Yup, I have the changes ready.
Just need to make sure the tests pass.
Will check if 'test -Dtest=cts -Dnojars=t' goes ok, and commit the changes + change the MC version to beta5. -
5. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
alesj Oct 25, 2007 7:44 PM (in response to adrian.brock)I'm now getting this - in all 4 configurations:
01:17:20,416 ERROR [Naming] Could not start on port 1099 java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method)
But I _did_ commit my changes anyway. In order for you and Thomas to resolve the bug that Adrian fixed with JBMICROCONT-212 + applying new AOP/CL changes Kabir did.
Going over my changes, they should only affect ProfileService code.
But let me know if something is broken due to MC_beta5 changes. :-( -
6. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
alesj Oct 25, 2007 7:48 PM (in response to adrian.brock)"alesj" wrote:
Going over my changes, they should only affect ProfileService code.
But let me know if something is broken due to MC_beta5 changes. :-(
btw: I was able to run the AS5_trunk w/o any problems yesterday with my MC_beta5 changes already applied.
This bind issue only popped after I updated the trunk today. -
7. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
starksm64 Oct 25, 2007 8:13 PM (in response to adrian.brock)I'll validate the changes, but doubt this error is related.
-
8. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
starksm64 Oct 25, 2007 9:07 PM (in response to adrian.brock)Its working fine.
-
9. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
adrian.brock Oct 26, 2007 7:50 AM (in response to adrian.brock)Ok, I've moved the redeploy fix to beta6 and scheduled it for next friday
(2nd November) in case there are other fixes that need to go in that release.
beta6 is required to fix JBAS-4900
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=122158 -
10. Re: Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta5
adrian.brock Oct 26, 2007 7:55 AM (in response to adrian.brock)I also marked beta5 as released in JIRA on October 20th (which is the date
in the repository).