-
1. Re: deployers/metadata-beans.xml
starksm64 May 22, 2008 4:00 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)The ReferenceMetaDataResolverDeployer has one commented out, and the current implementation uncommented. Since the newer impl has been in use for a while I have deleted the old impl.
I don't follow what you mean by name consistency. It sounds like a missing dependency problem. What name would show this? -
2. Re: deployers/metadata-beans.xml
anil.saldhana May 22, 2008 4:09 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)I meant all the other beans.xml in the deployers directory had the format xxx-deployer-beans.xml (consistency).
I should have noticed that one of the beans was commented out. My bad.
If you rename the file to metadata-deployer-beans.xml, then you see the error that the beans are already installed. -
3. Re: deployers/metadata-beans.xml
starksm64 May 22, 2008 4:48 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)Ok, I'll see what is up when the name is changed.
-
4. Re: deployers/metadata-beans.xml
dimitris May 27, 2008 4:50 AM (in response to anil.saldhana)Anil, I just tried the renaming and I don't see the issues you mention. Can you verify?
-
5. Re: deployers/metadata-beans.xml
anil.saldhana May 30, 2008 2:20 PM (in response to anil.saldhana)DImitris, the renaming seems fine. I am unsure why I saw issues before. Theoretically, a change in name of the file should not be creating deployment order issues (because it is the beans inside, that matter). :)
Most probably I had both metadata-deployer-beans.xml and metadata-beans.xml in deployer