-
1. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
will those contextual annotations in 299 replace @Scope in Seam 3?Yes of course. Obviously.
299/Weld is supposed to replace the core of Seam. so that's: %SEAM_HOME%\src\main\org\jboss\seam\core package, correct? does the Weld core injection affect annotations package as well in Seam 2.x?It means the whole Seam core. Not the package named
core
. It means jboss-seam.jar. -
2. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
ok cool. so I imagine Seam 3 will be backwards-compatible with Seam 2.x apps? So that means in Seam 3 I can still use @In instead of @Inject?
-
3. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
We will provide interoperability between Seam2 style beans and JSR-299 beans. Of course, we don't recommend that you use @In in new code.
I'm 99% certain that you've asked this question before.
-
4. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
Soon he'll ask if Seam 3 is ready yet ;-) Sorry, couldn't help myself...
-
5. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
LOL. Do you think we could implement an ArbiQuestionGeneratorBean in CDI?
-
6. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
Actually, come to think of it, how sure are we that Arbi isn't a bean?
-
7. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
Well, we could always try specializing him...
-
8. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
Keep asking questions Arbi, I for one enjoy reading them :)
Haven't started looking at CDI yet and I'll no doubt have learned lots useful bits and bobs by quickly checking the forum now and then.
Micke
-
9. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
yeah, sorry. not only do i ask a lot of questions, i don't check for duplication prior to posting, don't always read the specs and i have a bad memory.
anyways, at least you guys have some fun about it.
But if you specialized (a clone of) me, that would really make me and the rest of the forumites feel extra special. lol.
I have myself deployed as a singleton bean using @Factory method in an infinite loop, generating lots of questions for your (dis)enjoyment. lol.
-
-
11. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
Ok, cool, it's hard to tell in these forums. The concepts in 299 are difficult to grasp so I know I'm asking some basic/stupid questions. But as long as I learn that's fine.
anyways, I have a
meeting
with an acquired company tomorrow in SoCal for a possible newfunction
. I may be doing professional Seam 2.x development again very soon (crossing my fingers). Unfortunately, the larger parent company may presumably in the future beenforcing
the current Java enterprise platform standard (you guessed it, Spring) for new app development upon this smaller, purchased division. I don't want that to happen.Can't you guys get me a job with Redhat or an affiliate to help make CDI (EE 6) and/or Seam 3 more common as the
corporate Java development platform/standard
? Is that a marketing function or a product manager function or what? -
12. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
Perhaps they will consider if you manager to get VMWare to adopt Seam 3 as their framework of choise ;-)
-
13. Re: Weld annotations replacing existing Seam annotations in Seam 3?
By the time that happens, Oracle will have bought VMWare. Seems like the only company Oracle won't buy is Microsoft. btw, I installed Windows 7 Ultimate on my pc and it's very good so far...