Just wondering if would be possible to have JBPM6_ database table prefixes in future jBPM 6.0 stable versions...
I just installed jBPM 6.0 Beta2 demo and I discovered that table names have no prefixes unlike jBPM 4 had.
Can someone involved in active jBPM development give me some news in this regard?
Best would be to open jira for it and add some comments about why you think it makes sense to have prefix for these tables.
In mean time you could try this to workaround it.
Retrieving data ...