Version 1

    [10:09pm] balunasj: serogers: So I staged the release last night

    [10:10pm] serogers: balunasj: Yes, I saw that
    [10:10pm] pernik: balunasj: great. But we have milestone in the end of September
    [10:10pm] balunasj: serogers: and created to cover doc items for release.
    [10:10pm] jbossbot: jira [RFPL-767] Finalize/tag/release/upload the M2 version of the documentation [Open, Major, Sean Rogers]
    [10:10pm] nbelaevski joined the chat room.
    [10:10pm] nbelaevski: hello all
    [10:10pm] pernik: balunasj: we would appreciate any docs which would help
    [10:11pm] balunasj: pernik: For 3.3 your best bet is to use either what is in the reference guide ( as I said some have JS API info ).
    [10:11pm] balunasj: pernik: Or ask on the forums for specific component info - such as SDT ( which has no public
    [10:11pm] balunasj: JS API)
    [10:11pm] balunasj: nbelaevski: hi Nick
    [10:12pm] serogers: Oh sorry, that's not the JS API
    [10:12pm] pernik: yes, but for SDT there is no JS API info, and for ContextMenu there is also nothing (except show and hide)
    [10:13pm] serogers: Hi nbelaevski
    [10:13pm] nbelaevski: serogers: balunasj: hi, sorry for being late
    [10:13pm] pernik: for contextmenu I need to disable menu item by javascript
    [10:13pm] balunasj: nbelaevski: np
    [10:13pm] pernik: OK. Make your meeting. I can postpone my problems
    [10:14pm] balunasj: pernik: Thanks, I would post on the forums, and then we'll address there.
    [10:14pm] balunasj: serogers: How are we with the docs, and doc build?
    [10:15pm] pernik: balunasj: thnx
    [10:15pm] serogers: I'm ready to go. If everyone is happy with the latest draft that ilya_shaikovsky reviewed then I can package and upload the docs tomorrow
    [10:15pm] balunasj: pernik: sure, np, wish we had something to point you too.
    [10:16pm] balunasj: serogers: ok great, I'll review today what I can.
    [10:16pm] balunasj: serogers: how is the separate build structure working for you?
    [10:17pm] serogers: Fine, it seems great
    [10:17pm] balunasj: serogers: ok good
    [10:18pm] ilya_shaikovsky: balunasj, serogers, there are still things to re-check in general but I think for new M2 component and some M1- we are in good shape
    [10:18pm] balunasj: serogers: One thing I was thinking about was what "tag" name docs should have.
    [10:18pm] balunasj: The Milestone tags have date strings in them
    [10:19pm] balunasj: Options are match latest date on project tag, or just use the date when you tag.
    [10:19pm] balunasj: ilya_shaikovsky: Yeah - I saw you spend time reviewing!!  I'm glad you did.
    [10:19pm] serogers: Hmm... I think maybe match the project tag to avoid confusion
    [10:20pm] balunasj: serogers: The only problem there, is if we respin ( might be likely) thenthe dates would not match anyway.
    [10:20pm] balunasj: serogers: but I don't feel strongly either way.
    [10:21pm] ilya_shaikovsky: balunasj, I plan to increase time on that if that ok.. need to review parts from prev releases also
    [10:21pm] serogers: True... I'm not sure
    [10:21pm] balunasj: ilya_shaikovsky: agree
    [10:21pm] ilya_shaikovsky: good
    [10:21pm] balunasj: serogers: Just use whatever date to tag on
    [10:22pm] balunasj: We'll just use the "latest" date of yyyymmdd-M2
    [10:22pm] serogers: OK. I'm not sure how to do the tagging, I believe you've done it in the past. Is it something I can do?
    [10:22pm] balunasj: serogers: you should be able too
    [10:23pm] serogers: How is it done?
    [10:23pm] balunasj: If you do it early tomorrow  - I might be able to assist since I might be online
    [10:24pm] serogers: Is it done through SVN?
    [10:24pm] balunasj: serogers: with the mvn release plugin
    [10:24pm] serogers: Oh, OK
    [10:24pm] balunasj: serogers: I'm going to be writing up the release process for the project today in wiki.
    [10:24pm] serogers: OK
    [10:24pm] balunasj: Should be similar, but might have slight differences based on your build.
    [10:25pm] balunasj: serogers: Then once released, we can discuss future tasks, etc....
    [10:26pm] serogers: Sure
    [10:26pm] balunasj: serogers: Having the docs be a separate bundle ( and upload ) is fine with me.
    [10:27pm] balunasj: serogers: anything else you wanted to discuss at this point.
    [10:27pm] balunasj: I'll likely be on tonight and will help with release.
    [10:27pm] balunasj: is everything in /trunk that you want there?
    [10:28pm] serogers: Yes, I merged recently
    [10:28pm] serogers: Nothing else to discuss really
    [10:29pm] balunasj: ok great, we'll talk tonight/tomorrow morning for you