Version 1

    Note: See transcript for details


    Group Name

    • Dan introduced our group name "Application Developer Platform (Group)"
    • Helps to identify the suite of related projects ( RichFaces, Seam, CDI, JBoss Tools, & Hibernate*)

    JSF 2.1 Discussions

    • XSD for jsf/core and jsf/html in impl
      • For now add to RichFaces
      • CDK provides ways to do this
    • .xhtml vs .xml vs .view.xml
      • Briefly discussed as an issue to discuss
    • Misc items to be discussed in future
      • Queue interop issues
      • Spec Issues -
      • Portlet support
        • Need an FAQ or "how not to shoot yourself in the foot when programming for portliest"
          • Alex and Wesley are going work on it
          • Used by other projects to help integrate
        • Portlet support is important but for RF needs to wait until after A2 is released

    JSF Mock Test Project

    • Discussed plans and goals at high level
    • Would like to see this a full JBoss project in test area
    • Needs to be handled after RF A2 is released

    Component Placement and Ownership

    • Some points:
      • a) We need to avoid having conflicting components (Seam and RichFaces both have file upload for example)
        • RF might want to consider having more fine-grained library sets...just to make them more consumable
      • b) We need to treat this as a two way street, which means a better, more open attitude from the Seam team
    • Dan feels strongly that UIViewAction be in Seam
      • That is fine with RF
    • RF is concerned that shifting too many component around will cause RF users to consume seam-faces to be useful
      • Dependency management in seam-faces is important to keep use easy for RF users
    • Discussed differences between functional and view components
      • Reviewed some of Seams current set that might be better in RF
      • And other way around
    • Validation and client-side validation
      • Complex and will need to be worked on by both projects