These are just some quick notes on what you might want to do make JBossMQ work better.
The default configuration is pretty unoptimized, but relatively safe in that it works in even the most restrictive of memory settings and with the least capable jdbc drivers.
Unfortunately, the threading model is pretty broken in JBossMQ. It has been since the original design. If you are having problems too many threads or too much context switching then you should consider JBoss Messaging, it is more performant and more feature rich for other reasons as well.
The default configs that come with JBoss for persistence, see docs/examples/jms are not optimized. You should get your DBA to create the tables manually and analyse your use case to maybe add or change the indexes.
Hypersonic, don't use it
Make sure you change the cache config to match your memory settings, otherwise you are going to be redundantly overflowing messages onto disk when there is still plenty of memory left.
You might also want to disable soft references altogether on the cache if this is giving your garbage collector problems and throttle the softening check using the
The main changes are in the buffer sizes. But unless you have lots of large messages this isn't going to make much difference since the buffer is flushed on every request anyway.
If your messaging clients are co-located with the JBossMQ server (in the same virtual machine) and you aren't using HAJMS, then you should use the in memory connector.
Even if you are using HAJMS, you should use something like the
LinkRefPair defined in
to automatically optimize away the networking when it is not necessary. This is just a jndi trick.
Most problems with JMS performance relate to antipatterns. The most common of which is continually opening and closing connections. The spec mentions this. You should pool or cache the connection and use one session per thread.
To make your life easier there is the JMS Resource Adapter inside the appserver. Use it!