-
1. Re: Specification Stability?
bill.burke Nov 23, 2004 9:00 AM (in response to ttarhan)I'm on the EG, and I'd say that the next draft due sometime before end of year should be pretty close to the final.
After the 1st early draft, members of the JDO 2.0 specification moved to EJB 3.0 so there needed to be some time to consolidate their ideas.
Bill -
2. Re: Specification Stability?
ttarhan Nov 23, 2004 1:09 PM (in response to ttarhan)My fear is that we may start working w/ EJB3 based on the current draft and find out in Jan/Feb, when we're 70% done, that the specification is radically different. Small syntax changes don't matter -- but if, for example, the whole idea of detaching/merging entity beans might disappear, that would cause a significant challenge for us. So my question is more related to the conceptual-level idea of the draft. Is most of the EG on the same page with annotation-oriented configuration and Hibernate-based Entity Beans, or is some part of that likely to change?
-
3. Re: Specification Stability?
ttarhan Nov 23, 2004 4:02 PM (in response to ttarhan)Here's a more important way to look at this: If the specification does change, does JBoss plan to support an easy migration bath from the preview release to the final release?
-
4. Re: Specification Stability?
bill.burke Nov 23, 2004 5:22 PM (in response to ttarhan)If you have a support contract with JBoss Inc., we will support any migration you need. If you need information, you know how to contact me.
If you don't get a support contract, well...., you get what you pay for and are at the mercy of those who lurk on this forum answering your questions in a timely manner.
All and all, we'll do our best to support EJB 3.0 on these forums as its important for overall adoption, but remember free software doesn't always mean free help.
FYI, we'll be offering EJB 3.0 training sometime Q1 2005. We have multiple 24x7 support offerings and also do onsite training and consulting.
Bill -
5. Re: Specification Stability?
ttarhan Nov 23, 2004 6:48 PM (in response to ttarhan)Understood. My concern is mostly fueled by all of the comments I read online about EJB3. Some of the purists still have a problem with the implementation details in the early draft spec. I, personally, like the specification as-is. I'd hate to see the EG listen too much to purist extremists.
-
6. Re: Specification Stability?
bill.burke Nov 23, 2004 7:05 PM (in response to ttarhan)Well, Gavin King, Hibernate Creator, is on EG. I pretty much totally trust him to help steer the spec in the right direction.