0 Replies Latest reply on Feb 13, 2006 10:20 AM by Mark Little

    Some core requirements

    Mark Little Master

      The ESB is seen as the next generation of EAI ? better and without the vendor-lockin characteristics of old. As such, many of the capabilities of a good ESB mirror those of existing EAI offerings. Traditional EAI stacks consist of: Business Process Monitoring, Integrated Development Environment, Human Workflow User Interface, Business Process Management, Connectors, Transaction Manager, Security, Application Container, Messaging Service, Metadata Repository, Naming and Directory Service, Distributed Computing Architecture.

      As with EAI systems, ESB is not about business logic ? that is left to higher levels. It is about infrastructure logic. Although there are many different definitions of what constitutes an ESB, what everyone agrees on now is that an ESB is part of an SOA infrastructure. However, SOA is not simply a technology or a product: it's a style of design, with many aspects (such as architectural, methodological and organisational) unrelated to the actual technology. But obviously at some point it becomes necessary to map the abstract SOA to a concrete implementation and that's where the ESB comes in to play.

      By considering ESB in terms of an SOA infrastructure, then we have the flexibility to abstract away from given implementation choices, such as JMS, SOAP etc. Then we define the capabilities that we want from our SOA infrastructure, which become the capabilities for the ESB.

      However, because of their heritage, ESBs typically come with a few assumptions that are not inherent to SOA:
      ? Java specific.
      ? Run-time message mediator.
      ? Message translation.
      ? Security model translation.

      Loose coupling does not require a mediator to route messages, although that is dominant ESB architecture. This is also a requirement within the JBI specification. The ESB model should not restrict the SOA model, but should be seen as a concrete (possibly narrower) representation of SOA. As a result, if there is a conflict between the way SOA would approach something and the way in which is may be done in a traditional ESB, the SOA approach will win in JBossESB.

      Therefore, in JBossESB, mediation will be a deployment choice and not a mandatory requirement. Obviously for compliance with certain specifications it may be configured by default, but if developers don't need that compliance point, they should be able to remove it (generally or on a per service basis).