-
1. Re: Collection Having Foreign Key In Secondary Table Not Imp
So is moving all these posts to the user forums.
Can't you guys read?
If you want to discuss actually implementing it, then please feel free to post in the
design/development forums. -
2. Re: Collection Having Foreign Key In Secondary Table Not Imp
Of course i can read!
That response was blatantly rude and i take offense. I did contemplate the idea of posting it here but decided that it would be of more interest to the individuals involved in the "DESIGN" aspects of the technology and not end-users.
The reason: there was no specific problem that I needed to overcome. I was making a comment to the developers. I believe my question was more a design/release question.
In the future I will email you all of my complaints/issues perhaps.
Remember .. You really do love us. -
3. Re: Collection Having Foreign Key In Secondary Table Not Imp
Hi,
This is something that might be complex to implement and mainly for corner case legacy DB support, that why this feature has not been prioritized.
Contributions welcome however, if it's critical for you :-)
PS: In French there is a saying "qui aime bien, chatie bien", literaly "People who cares/love, bash": That might be the whole point of remember we love you ;-) -
4. Re: Collection Having Foreign Key In Secondary Table Not Imp
well actually it's more "people who loves, punish"