Is it possible in RC4 to describe ejb3 entities for 3 tables that has column that is PK and FK for table A, PK and FK for table B and PK for table C?
RC4 ejb3 container cannot correctly process entity for table B (while RC3 can correctly process this situation with AccessType.FIELD).

For example, table B is table COMPANIES in ORACLE. CLIENTID is PK and FK for table COMPANIES, PK and FK for table COMPANIES_STR and PK for table CLIENTS.

In this case of entity description

@Entity
@Table(name="COMPANIES")
public class Companies implements Serializable {

 @Id
 @Column(name="CLIENTID", nullable=false)
 public Long clientid;

 @Id
 @ManyToOne(targetEntity=com.p5soft.seb.ejb.data.model.Clients.class)
 @JoinColumn(name="CLIENTID", referencedColumnName="CLIENTID")
 public Clients clients;

 @OneToMany(targetEntity=com.p5soft.seb.ejb.data.model.CompaniesStr.class)
 @JoinColumn(name="CLIENTID", referencedColumnName="CLIENTID")
 public Collection<CompaniesStr> companiesStrCollection;
?

As a result of deployment I received altered table COMPANIES with new wrong column ?CLIENTS?.
Is it possible in this version of EJB3 to describe these relationships correctly?