This content has been marked as final.
Show 5 replies
-
1. Re: EJB 3.0 stability
webmarck Nov 15, 2006 4:08 AM (in response to jackar)Stability is in my opinion a highly personal subject. But if you look at the history of this forum then many have praised the stability of the software and I have personally can say nothing but good things about it. We are close to putting some ejb3 code into production and I know that some already has it.
-
2. Re: EJB 3.0 stability
jackar Nov 15, 2006 7:40 AM (in response to jackar)"webmarck" wrote:
We are close to putting some ejb3 code into production and I know that some already has it.
Any specific project (and preferable feedback)? So far I have heard only gossips (somenone has heard that some project was using EJB 3.0). -
3. Re: EJB 3.0 stability
konstantin.ermakov Nov 15, 2006 10:34 AM (in response to jackar)Hi!
Our EJB3 project is under development. IMHO, EJB3 is stable enough. -
4. Re: EJB 3.0 stability
jackar Nov 16, 2006 4:56 AM (in response to jackar)Thanks,
Could you give some details of the project? -
5. Re: EJB 3.0 stability
konstantin.ermakov Nov 16, 2006 5:18 AM (in response to jackar)Sorry, but the only details I can give you are, that we have 20 Entity Beans, 1 Timer Bean, 1 Message-Driven Bean, 18 Session Beans for DAO,
Some extra service and session beans which are doing some background job. The project is not on-the-web, so we have the fat client with rich GUI.