This content has been marked as final.
Show 5 replies
-
1. Re: How does JBPM support
xiaoqj Feb 15, 2007 11:50 PM (in response to xiaoqj)=> A ---> B ---> C ###| | | ###V V V ###D ---> E ---->F =>
-
2. Re: How does JBPM support
kukeltje Feb 16, 2007 7:11 AM (in response to xiaoqj)are a and b splits?, can e be created twice (once from D, once from B? Please give more info
-
3. Re: How does JBPM support
xiaoqj Feb 16, 2007 10:44 AM (in response to xiaoqj)Yeah, both "A" and "B" split. Then Join or Synchronization at "E" node is hard to implement. Because tokens from node "B" and "D" are not siblings. After ending the two entering tokens from "B" and "D", which token should be placed at node "E" and carries out the following execution.
It seems that parent-child relationship between tokens is not enough to simulate partial order relationship between activities. -
4. Re: How does JBPM support
xiaoqj Feb 16, 2007 10:46 AM (in response to xiaoqj)
Graph=> A ---> B ---> C ###| | | ###V V V ###D ---> E ---->F =>
illustrates partial order dependencies among activities "A" .. "F" -
5. Re: How does JBPM support
kukeltje Feb 16, 2007 12:02 PM (in response to xiaoqj)This is not supported by jBPM. join/forks have to be fully nested. If you want custom behaviour, you can develop custom fork and accompanying join nodes to achieve what you want.