This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: ICEfaces vs. Richfaces
sergeysmirnov Aug 13, 2008 5:57 PM (in response to asookazian)RichFaces doesnot use server-side DOM. So, the question is nonsensical in general.
-
2. Re: ICEfaces vs. Richfaces
asookazian Aug 13, 2008 6:00 PM (in response to asookazian)"SergeySmirnov" wrote:
RichFaces doesnot use server-side DOM. So, the question is nonsensical in general.
So are there going to be any mods done to alleviate the dreaded Seam error: ConversationEndedTimedOutOrWasProcessingAnotherRequest?
What design does Richfaces use if it's not server-side DOM?? -
3. Re: ICEfaces vs. Richfaces
sergeysmirnov Aug 13, 2008 6:10 PM (in response to asookazian)Read the Developers Guide.
-
4. Re: ICEfaces vs. Richfaces
asookazian Aug 14, 2008 5:06 PM (in response to asookazian)"SergeySmirnov" wrote:
RichFaces doesnot use server-side DOM. So, the question is nonsensical in general.
As nonsensical as it may appear be, it's even more absurd to a user to see that error (ConversationEndedTimedOutOrWasProcessingAnotherRequest) on the screen and it's definitely the most frustrating part of working with Richfaces as a Seam developer.
So Icefaces holds this significant advantage over Richfaces from a programmer's perspective (i.e. I won't have to manually consider and code for eventsQueue, requestDelays, etc. with Icefaces). If that situation simply cannot occur, that's great...