JBossDeveloper

 

"adrian@jboss.org" wrote:
Anyway I've had enough of this thread.

Couldn't agree more.
I'll do as you proposed, now that I understand. ;-)

"adrian@jboss.org" wrote:

We can continue to argue about arguing as much as you want,
but it isn't going to get us anywhere. :-)

Sure, we'll continue this in Neu end of April, over beer of course. :-)

 

"adrian@jboss.org" wrote:

* What there isn't is a declartive (annotation) to ignore case when the xml
enum type extends xsd:string.

@JBossXmlEnum(ignoreCase=true)
public enum Root
{
 ONE,
 TWO,
 THREE
}

 protected void testEnumValueAdapter(EnumValueAdapter enumValueAdapter)
 {
 super.testEnumValueAdapter(enumValueAdapter);

 assertEquals(Root.ONE, enumValueAdapter.cast("one", Root.class));
 assertEquals(Root.ONE, enumValueAdapter.cast("One", Root.class));
 assertEquals(Root.ONE, enumValueAdapter.cast("ONE", Root.class));

 assertEquals(Root.TWO, enumValueAdapter.cast("two", Root.class));
 assertEquals(Root.TWO, enumValueAdapter.cast("Two", Root.class));
 assertEquals(Root.TWO, enumValueAdapter.cast("TWO", Root.class));

 assertEquals(Root.THREE, enumValueAdapter.cast("three", Root.class));
 assertEquals(Root.THREE, enumValueAdapter.cast("Three", Root.class));
 assertEquals(Root.THREE, enumValueAdapter.cast("THREE", Root.class));
 }

Can I now get a 'you (finally) understand' tag? ;-)