-
15. Re: Another startup time regression
The legacy ant one, i.e. just update build/build-thirdparty.xml to use:
<componentref name="jboss/aop" version="snapshot"/>
-
16. Re: Another startup time regression
The boot times I'm seing. I use 2 runs where the 2nd is faster because of the cached disk files, on XP.
Intel Core2/T7200@2GHz/2GRAM
WinXP/Sun15
With AOP 2.0.0.CR71st-run 2nd-run minimal 4 4 default 34 32 all 55 55
With latest AOP snapshot:1st-run 2nd-run minimal 9 4 default 41 27 all 91 43
It seems snapshot is slower, so I'm not changing the build now. More profiling is probably needed.
BTW, maybe we should create a wiki with boot time results people see in various CPU/OS/JVM combinations, so we have a measure to compare against. -
17. Re: Another startup time regression
hi, i finished http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-532 last week, it gave me some speed increase in the boot time.
before the change:
default: 27s:972ms 28s:385ms 31s:267ms
after the change:
default: 23s:573ms 24s:258ms 21s:791ms
this is with invisible annotation parsing support turned off. -
18. Re: Another startup time regression
Stale, are you using the latest AS trunk to get those numbers? I'm asking because that includes the enabling of the jboss.vfs.forceNoCopy=true flag.
-
19. Re: Another startup time regression
i tested this on feb 27 builded from trunk. i updated head and rebuilded as5 now and tested it again (with and without the annotation changes).
without annotation changes:
27s:162ms 27s:659ms 28s:46ms
with annotation changes:
21s:835ms 22s:460ms 22s:751ms
i profiled the bootup after the annotation changes and our primary problem atm is that for every new binding we rebuild the whole chain. flavia is working on a different implementation that would hopefully elimnate this or atleast reduce it significantly. this will be added to trunk within the next week. -
20. Re: Another startup time regression
I switched my local AS5 copy to AOP 'snapshot" and see a 20% improvement :-)