Nope, this is not supported.
is there anything wrong with attaching a logger as static member like so ?
@Logger private Log log; private static Log authLog = Logging.getLog("LoginLog");
would it be better to attach it as an instance member ?
The intended use is as an instvar.
But actually I could implement "static injection" of the logger object ... and perhaps I will go do that now...
Oh I misread. Logging.getLog() should work fine.
Oh and I implemented startup-time injection into static fields. And yes, you can have as many of them as you like (as long as they are static) :-)