-
30. Re: While Seam is great, is any weakness of this framework?
You missed the point. Yes, time was spent integrating Seam with plain JTA and Tomcat (and I don't regret it), but I don't see why Seam documentation and examples shouldn't incorporate these findings. So far, I've seen no interest in making Tomcat users' life easier.
-
31. Re: While Seam is great, is any weakness of this framework?
A good starting point is to write up your findings on the wiki, for others to view. Then, create a JIRA request asking to have them included in the docs. If you've already done that, then I guess it's just taking time for them to be pulled in!
-
32. Re: While Seam is great, is any weakness of this framework?
Thanks Pete. I had my findings posted a while ago in this forum (http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=104525), and now waiting for JIRA admins to resolve my inability to post new issues there. My integration covers JOTM, Atomikos and JBoss Transactions (Arjuna JTA) - frankly, I hoped that the integration with the latter one would generate some more attention from JBoss crowd, that being a JBoss product and such. I also tried to explore integration with the JTA/JCA taken from the JBoss AS, but couldn't find any documentation on these modules (heck, even Javadoc is a pain to find!)