Hi,
I'm running Seam 2.0.0.B1 and I have the following lines in the console:

16:13:37,004 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.persistence.persistenceProvider
16:13:37,051 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.resourceLoader
16:13:37,067 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.expressions
16:13:37,067 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.parameters
16:13:37,067 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.bpm.businessProcess
16:13:37,082 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.manager
16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.userPrincipal
16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.ajax4jsfFilter
16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.security.identity
16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.isUserInRole
16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.resourceBundle

Source code that is causing this:

org\jboss\seam\bpm\BusinessProcess

@Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION)
@Name("org.jboss.seam.bpm.businessProcess")
@BypassInterceptors
@Install(dependencies="org.jboss.seam.bpm.jbpm", precedence=BUILT_IN)

org\jboss\seam\faces\BusinessProcess

@Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION)
@Name("org.jboss.seam.bpm.businessProcess")
@BypassInterceptors
@Install(dependencies="org.jboss.seam.bpm.jbpm", precedence=FRAMEWORK, classDependencies="javax.faces.context.FacesContext")

Is this supposed to be like that? The latest repository version that I have has the same problem. There is a faces override that is causing the notice to appear. Shouldn't there be a more "clear" way to do the override?

PS Excuse me if this question was discussed in a previous thread...