1 Reply Latest reply on Dec 28, 2009 11:22 AM by jaikiran

Need ClassFilterUtils.JDK6 ?

alrubinger Dec 28, 2009 9:11 AM

ClassFilterUtils provides for:

public static final ClassFilter JAVA_ONLY = JavaOnlyClassFilter.INSTANCE;

...where:

private JavaOnlyClassFilter()
   {
      super(new String[] { "java\\..+", "javax\\..+" }, 
            new String[] { "java/.+", "javax/.+" },
            new String[] { "java", "java\\..*", "javax", "javax\\..*" });
   }

This does not account for other non-java(x) packages within JDK6. Perhaps we should add something like:

final ClassFilter nonJavaJDK6Filter = new PackageClassFilter(new String[]
      {"org.w3c.dom", "org.xml.sax", "org.omg", "org.ietf.jgss"});
final ClassFilter jdk6Filter = CombiningClassFilter.create(false, ClassFilterUtils.JAVA_ONLY,
            nonJavaJDK6Filter); // Functionally equivalent to this

...?

I may have a usecase in mind for EmbeddedAS (still working out if it makes more sense to provide isolation via jboss-cl or at a lower level).

ALR

1. Re: Need ClassFilterUtils.JDK6 ?

jaikiran Dec 28, 2009 11:22 AM (in response to alrubinger)
ALRubinger wrote:

This does not account for other non-java(x) packages within JDK6. Perhaps we should add something like:

final ClassFilter nonJavaJDK6Filter = new PackageClassFilter(new String[] {"org.w3c.dom", "org.xml.sax", "org.omg", "org.ietf.jgss"}); final ClassFilter jdk6Filter = CombiningClassFilter.create(false, ClassFilterUtils.JAVA_ONLY, nonJavaJDK6Filter); // Functionally equivalent to this

...

Is that for endorsed libraries? Perhaps, you need a "EndorsedClassFilter" which takes into account the libraries listed here http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/standards/index.html? However, each JDK implementation can further have their own set of endorsed packages, so you probably will end up having different filters for each vendor?
Actions