1 Reply Latest reply on Jun 22, 2010 12:03 PM by Aslak Knutsen

    onlyOne check for Arquillian spi

    Cosmin Martinconi Newbie



      I took a look at Arquillian's implementation and saw that, for example the "ApplicationArchiveGenerator" interface has an SPI implementation file, with a given provider("DeploymentAnnotationArchiveGenerator"), and in the same time an "onlyOne" check when using it. I was wondering if this interface can be customized and extended, because that would be the scope of SPIs, taken in consideration that any customized class will not pass the "onlyOne" check.