2 Replies Latest reply on Nov 12, 2010 3:07 PM by Thomas Diesler

    [JBAS-8599] Provide JNDI InitialContext as OSGi service

    Thomas Diesler Master

      Jason sais

       

      Are the dependencies of naming on OSGi necessary? It seems like these
      services should be created by the osgi subsystem. Is the problem making
      these optional?

       

      I think its correct like this. The OSGi subsystem provides the OSGi service registry. Subsystem Foo may choose to publish a service in that registry which would then readily be available for installed bundles to use. The OSGi subsystem does not need to know about Foo.

       

      The dependency on org.jboss.as.osgi is there because Foo provides a PASSIVE service which activates when the Framework comes up. If the Framework was coming up eagerly a dependency on org.osgi.core would be sufficient. You should see no performance impact due to these additional services (i.e. only passive service registration)