-
15. Re: EJBTHREE-2198 EJB resource providers for switchboard and the dependency issues
Ales Justin wrote:
OK, I think I now understand where this is going. :-)
Who will then change the no-interface view and singleton binder / deployer to use this new naming schema?
Should I do this or will you do it?
Me If we decide to go for this approach. I have asked Carlo to provide some of his inputs here.
Ales Justin wrote:
What's the EJB name in this case -- from JBossSessionBeanMetaData?
JBossSessionBeanMetaData::getEjbName?
Yes.
-
16. Re: EJBTHREE-2198 EJB resource providers for switchboard and the dependency issues
I've commited the initial simple impl:
From our discussion this looks like it should work -- once you add your stuff. :-)
Is there anything else I can help you with?
Should I try to reproduce this error and see if we can actually make it work once all the pieces are in place?