This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: deployment type too restrictive?
nickarls Apr 3, 2009 1:44 PM (in response to gonorrhea)I don't know the current state of this but personally I wouldn't mind having many (non-built in) enabled deployment types and none would be ignored. It would then be up to the developer to not enable stuff that causes non-desired overloading
-
2. Re: deployment type too restrictive?
pmuir Apr 4, 2009 1:13 PM (in response to gonorrhea)I think the current state is sufficient. I can't see any use cases for allowing multiple, and it increases complexity further.