I thought it would be better to start a new post after working through this issue.

My problem is when I startup my Jetty server and the org.jnp.server.NamingServer class from the jboss-ejb3-all.jar tries to bind multiple "names" to JNDI. I put a couple of system.out.println's in the bind method and stopped it from throwing (commented out)

javax.naming.NameAlreadyBoundException

so that my server would startup and deploy all my EJB's/managed stateless session beans.

So after 3 days of heads down coding I finally have a fully working Seam/Jetty/Embedded EJB server running. But, I had to modify the NamingServer class to do so. I also am seeing the same names being bound to JNDI, here is what I have from my console:

---------------setBinding: TransactionManager
---------------setBinding: TransactionPropagationContextImporter
---------------setBinding: TransactionPropagationContextExporter
---------------setBinding: UserTransaction
15:54:00,089 INFO [LocalTxDataSource] Bound datasource to JNDI name 'java:/DefaultDS'
---------------setBinding: DefaultJMSProvider
---------------setBinding: StdJMSPool
15:54:00,480 INFO [Queue] Bound to JNDI name: queue/DLQ
15:54:05,557 INFO [Ejb3Deployment] EJB3 deployment time took: 5047
15:54:08,892 INFO [Ejb3Deployment] EJB3 deployment time took: 3335
15:54:09,022 INFO [ServletContextListener] Welcome to Seam 1.2.0.PATCH1
..alot of things loading here...
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.debug.hotDeployFilter
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.servlet.multipartFilter
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.servlet.exceptionFilter
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.ui.graphicImage.dynamicImageResource
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.servlet.redirectFilter
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.ui.resource.webResource
15:54:10,334 INFO [Lifecycle] starting up: org.jboss.seam.core.ejb
15:54:10,334 INFO [Ejb] starting the embedded EJB container
---------------TransactionManager
---------------TransactionPropagationContextImporter
---------------TransactionPropagationContextExporter
---------------setBinding: UserTransaction
15:54:10,595 INFO [LocalTxDataSource] Bound datasource to JNDI name 'java:/DefaultDS'
15:54:11,206 INFO [Ejb3DescriptorHandler] adding class annotation org.jboss.annotation.internal.DefaultInterceptorMarker to com.halesconsulting.TestA
ctionBean org.jboss.annotation.internal.DefaultInterceptorMarkerImpl@b28f30
15:54:11,326 INFO [Ejb3Deployment] EJB3 deployment time took: 661
15:54:11,997 INFO [MCKernelAbstraction] installing bean: jboss.j2ee:jar=classes,name=TestActionBean,service=EJB3 with dependencies:
---------------setBinding: UserTransaction
15:54:12,117 INFO [EJBContainer] STARTED EJB: com.halesconsulting.TestActionBean ejbName: TestActionBean
---------------setBinding: local
15:54:12,147 INFO [MCKernelAbstraction] installing bean: jboss.j2ee:jar=jboss-seam-1.2.1.GA,name=Dispatcher,service=EJB3 with dependencies:
---------------setBinding: UserTransaction
15:54:12,167 INFO [EJBContainer] STARTED EJB: org.jboss.seam.core.Dispatcher ejbName: Dispatcher
---------------setBinding: local
15:54:12,167 INFO [MCKernelAbstraction] installing bean: jboss.j2ee:jar=jboss-seam-1.2.1.GA,name=TransactionListener,service=EJB3 with dependencies:
---------------setBinding: UserTransaction
15:54:12,197 INFO [EJBContainer] STARTED EJB: org.jboss.seam.core.TransactionListener ejbName: TransactionListener
---------------setBinding: local
---------------setBinding: localStatefulProxyFactory
15:54:12,217 INFO [Initialization] done initializing Seam
...loading config xml files here...
[INFO] Started Jetty Server
[INFO] Starting scanner at interval of 10 seconds.

Each "---------------setBinding" you see above is obviously from the

} catch (NameNotFoundException e) {
 System.out.println("---------------setBinding: " + name.toString());
 setBinding(name, obj, className);
 }

, and each name with just "-----------" is where the

throw new NameAlreadyBoundException();

would have been thrown.

My question is, am I doing something wrong or is this something that needs to be fixed?

Thanks,
Wesley Hales