Serializable

marx3 Feb 9, 2009 1:45 PM

SFSB are passivated when not needed. Should they implement Serializable interface? SeamGen doesn't generate such examples. I also see that container tries to passivate some SFSB despite not extending Serializable interface (and sometimes fails).
Booking example is also inconsistent - BookingListAction.java implements Serializable, other SFSB doesn't.

1. Re: Serializable

nickarls Feb 10, 2009 7:54 AM (in response to marx3)

Uneducated guess: you don't need to implement Serializable since you are always dealing with home objects/proxies that are automagically serializable.
Actions
2. Re: Serializable

marx3 Feb 10, 2009 8:30 AM (in response to marx3)

not exactly. What google says it's good practice to use Serializable in SFSB, but it's not obligatory because container always tries to passivate SFSB.
Actions

Go to original post