This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: Alternate BPM implementations
codejunkie May 21, 2009 8:27 PM (in response to codejunkie)Wow. Nothing, huh. I'm assuming nobody has even tried this? Wondered about this? Used this? Anybody?
-
2. Re: Alternate BPM implementations
genman May 22, 2009 6:46 AM (in response to codejunkie)Since Seam is open source ... I have looked at the source code and you could probably replicate what's the for JBPM in terms of components.
Contributing your own wrappers would probably be appreciated.
The limitations I see, with IBM's stuff, is you probably won't be able to integrate EL expressions that Seam provides. Meaning, for a process action or decision component, you can't do a #{foo.action()} . What I mean, is IBM's process server won't be able to use Seam like JBPM can.
Not sure if there's any other limitations.