- 
        1. Re: hibernate validations with icefaces and without seam framework?lvdberg Aug 7, 2009 9:56 AM (in response to bimki)Well, Re-consider your choice because Seam helps you a lot with the plumbing of your application. And if you really insist: Hibernate validation documentation should provide you with suffient help to get it working by calling the validator framework yourself (it's really easy). Leo 
- 
        2. Re: hibernate validations with icefaces and without seam framework?bimki Aug 11, 2009 10:13 PM (in response to bimki)thanks for Your reply. 
 Whole seam framewor is to heavy for me and I don't want to use whole framework, but I'd like to have annotation based bean validation :)
- 
        3. Re: hibernate validations with icefaces and without seam framework?kukeltje.ronald.jbpm.org Aug 12, 2009 6:55 PM (in response to bimki)The whole framework is to big... ok, In Seam 3 it will be split in more manageable parts. But in the mean time you prefer: 
 - Not having Beans automatically available in JSF pages, but keep configuring faces-config.xml files
 - On top of that, implement hibernate validation yourself
 - No advantages of conversations?And keep the code you start building yourself maintained for the next few years? Hmmmm.... Would not be my choice just as Leo states, I would reconsider. I have one question though....If you do not want to use seam, why do you post in the seam forum? (no offence, just really curious) 
 
     
    