-
1. Re: hibernate validations with icefaces and without seam framework?
lvdberg Aug 7, 2009 9:56 AM (in response to bimki)Well,
Re-consider your choice because Seam helps you a lot with the plumbing of your application. And if you really insist: Hibernate validation documentation should provide you with suffient help to get it working by calling the validator framework yourself (it's really easy).
Leo
-
2. Re: hibernate validations with icefaces and without seam framework?
bimki Aug 11, 2009 10:13 PM (in response to bimki)thanks for Your reply.
Whole seam framewor is to heavy for me and I don't want to use whole framework, but I'd like to have annotation based bean validation :) -
3. Re: hibernate validations with icefaces and without seam framework?
kukeltje.ronald.jbpm.org Aug 12, 2009 6:55 PM (in response to bimki)The whole framework is to big... ok, In Seam 3 it will be split in more manageable parts. But in the mean time you prefer:
- Not having Beans automatically available in JSF pages, but keep configuring faces-config.xml files
- On top of that, implement hibernate validation yourself
- No advantages of conversations?And keep the code you start building yourself maintained for the next few years? Hmmmm.... Would not be my choice just as Leo states, I would reconsider.
I have one question though....If you do not want to use seam, why do you post in the seam forum? (no offence, just really curious)