-
1. Re: JDBC as a deployment or as a module?
hellview Apr 6, 2012 11:15 AM (in response to hfluz)Funny thing
Probably because deployments are propagated between cluster nodes and modules no. right?
at page 54:
The first and recommened approach consists of installing the driver as a module
In section named installing the driver as a deployment unit we will account for another approach which is usually a bit faster however it has a few limitations.
Next the author say that you will have problems with jdbc 4 non compliant driver using jdbc deployments.
It's better to deploy jdbc as module.
-
2. Re: JDBC as a deployment or as a module?
hfluz Apr 6, 2012 2:55 PM (in response to hellview)Davide, do you agree that the official documentation is not very clear about that?
-
3. Re: JDBC as a deployment or as a module?
hellview Apr 6, 2012 4:06 PM (in response to hfluz)I think that the sentence:
If your JDBC driver JAR is not JDBC 4-compliant, it can be made deployable in one of a few ways.
It's little ambiguous because is in the "Installing a JDBC driver as a deployment" section.
Anyway i preferer to install jdbc driver as module because i don't think to change often jdbc driver, i can take a couple of minutes to copy manually the directory without having problems about compliance or not compliance of jdbc driver.