3 Replies Latest reply on Jul 6, 2012 12:04 PM by ssilvert

JBoss 5.1 + JSF 1.2 + Facelets + Richfaces = Problems

neofox01 Jul 6, 2012 11:01 AM

Hi,

I'm starting a web development project for JBoss 5.1 with the following technologies: JSF 1.2 + Facelets + Richfaces 3.3.3.

The documentation for JBoss 5.1 says that it comes with JSF 1.2 (Mojarra) but I've experienced problems that makes me think that something is wrong with the JSF version that comes with the server. First, the @PostConstruct doesn't work at all, I've tried a couple solutions found in the forum (https://community.jboss.org/thread/150609) but without any success. Second, the <h:selectOneMenu> doesn't support enums, It needs a converter, but since JSF 1.2 the enum converter its built in the framework.

Does anybody have the same issues? ... It's like if I've been working in JSF 1.1 version.

Thanks in advance for your help.

1. Re: JBoss 5.1 + JSF 1.2 + Facelets + Richfaces = Problems

ctomc Jul 6, 2012 10:26 AM (in response to neofox01)

Hi,

first of all, this is AS7 forum not 5.1

in any case i would recomend you to go with AS7 and EE6 tehnologies, that means JSF 2+ facelets (which are part of JSF now) + richfaces 4.

@postconstruct and everyting else will surely work with as7.
also you get CDI for free

--
tomaz
Actions
2. Re: JBoss 5.1 + JSF 1.2 + Facelets + Richfaces = Problems

neofox01 Jul 6, 2012 10:54 AM (in response to ctomc)

Hi,

Sorry for the disorientation, I'll open a new thread where It should be.

Thanks for your suggestion, but the server version is a limitation of the production enviroment... Nothing will make me happier than working with cutting edge technology

Does anybody have another suggestion?
Actions
3. Re: JBoss 5.1 + JSF 1.2 + Facelets + Richfaces = Problems

ssilvert Jul 6, 2012 12:04 PM (in response to neofox01)

I know that this stuff works in AS5. For @PostConstruct you have to make sure you have a valid managed bean in request, session, or application scope. I don't remember any specifics about the enum converter but I'm sure it was working because it passed TCK.

Stan
Actions

Go to original post