> I don't see any way to access that data via CMP
> unless the IMAGE_RESOLUTIONS table turned into an
> Entity itself, but then yuck...
That is the way to do it. I am guessing that you say yuck because of granularity issues, but this is not really an issue in EJB 2.0. You only need to worry about granularity on remote interfaces and in terms of transaction size; you really don't want to move alot of small stuff to a remote system and you don't want lots of small transactions.