0 Replies Latest reply on Feb 8, 2013 11:29 AM by Dev Deviskec

    Arquillian Weld fails to Inject instance if annotated with @EJB, works if annotation changes to @Inject

    Dev Deviskec Newbie

      Weld deployed on Arquillian fails to inject the bean if the inject point is annotated with @EJB and succeeds if it's annotated with @Inject, as the example below shows. Please note that I am in a situation where I can't change the definition of the X and Y class, so how can I tell Weld/Arquillian to take the definition of X? The following example (also attached as source code) fails as NullPointerException in the doSomething() method of class Y when x.doSomething() gets invoked, because x is not/doesn't get injected.

       

      @Stateless

      public class X {

          public void doSomething() {

              System.out.println("doing something...");

          }

      }

      @Stateless

      public class Y {

          @EJB

          private X x;

          public void doSomething() {

              x.doSomething();

          }

      }

      @Test(groups = "main-group")

      public class ArquillianTest extends Arquillian { 

          @Inject

          private Y y;

          @Deployment

          public static JavaArchive createDeployment() {

              return ShrinkWrap.create(JavaArchive.class).addClasses(X.class, Y.class).add(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml");

          }

          public void someTest() {

              y.doSomething();

          }

      }

       

      P.S. Why does the configuration not fail, i.e. a missing dependency should be thrown by weld ?