-
1. Re: Seam 2.3.1 discrepancy between runtime execution and Seam-Arquillian test execution
manarh Dec 2, 2013 4:16 AM (in response to live4eva)Even I am not answering your question, I would recommend to use JunitSeamTest instead of Seam ARQ extension. Core Seam for itself integration tests don't use that extension due lack of integration of DI and JSF. Look at Seam EJB example tests at jboss-seam/examples/blog/blog-ejb/src/test/java/org/jboss/seam/example/blog/test/BlogTest.java at Seam_2_3 · seam2/jboss… or seam-integration-tests project at jboss-seam/seam-integration-tests at Seam_2_3 · seam2/jboss-seam · GitHub.
-
2. Re: Seam 2.3.1 discrepancy between runtime execution and Seam-Arquillian test execution
live4eva Dec 2, 2013 5:08 AM (in response to manarh)Hi Marek,
I am using JUnitSeamTest with Arquillian ... exactly like the example you referenced...
-
3. Re: Seam 2.3.1 discrepancy between runtime execution and Seam-Arquillian test execution
manarh Dec 2, 2013 6:38 AM (in response to live4eva)Duran Harris wrote:
Hi Marek,
I am using JUnitSeamTest with Arquillian ... exactly like the example you referenced...
Hmm, then I was confused by
When I use Arquillian Seam extension
Have you checked the configuration settings (like components,xml, web.xml, etc) to be the same as you have in final EAR deployment? Sometimes it helps to deploy testing ear/war to real container and try the use case manually.